10-22-2005 08:22 PM
#1
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
| |
10-22-2005 08:35 PM
#2
| |
10-22-2005 11:31 PM
#3
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
| |
10-25-2005 04:29 PM
#4
| |
6 max offers many benfits. | |
10-25-2005 08:19 PM
#5
| |
6 max has generally worse players. people tend to throw more money around and bluff more. if you are better at identifying bluffs, and at bluffing, than your opponents, then you will probably be able to make more money at 6-max. you also can lose money much faster, as it becomes more necessary to risk more of your stack on weaker holdings. | |
| |
11-06-2005 02:03 AM
#6
| |
6-max has a lot more variance, but I think the main benefit of it is that it makes you a far better poker player. You have to play more hands, make tougher decisions in more marginal situations, and pay a lot more attention to other people's playing styles. | |
| |
11-06-2005 06:56 PM
#7
| |
in addition, I think another big advantage to having 6-max expierience is that if you are playing full-ring, and the table starts to break up and there are still 5-6 people there, most people will stick to their tighter full-ring style. you can start picking up a lot of small pots and just dominating these people. it's fun! | |
| |
11-07-2005 10:02 AM
#8
| |
![]() ![]()
|
One of my favourite things about pokerroom is that there are 5-handed tables, and for some reason they play differently to 6max tables at other sites. If anyone can explain why (I play the $50NL tables) I'd be interested to hear your theories. |