Quote Originally Posted by Andrew
The one thing I did notice is that his range (26.4%) added to the amount of times we pick up the blinds (73.6%) equals 100%. Now whether this is not important or I'm working at things backwards I'm not sure. I'm still very green on the math side of poker.

But from what I've seen played I'll answer your questions.

1 - Villain should eventually work out that we have a wideish range in which we're stealing the blinds. Depending on his skill level and patience I'd say villain is going to wait until he gets a monster or at min a coin flip against us so the one time he calls, we're in trouble. Incidentally this exact method is exactly what Phil Hellmuth talked about on Poker After Dark this week. I think his range is going to be more like:

55+, A6/7s+, A6/70+, K9s+, K9o+

Not sure why though but that's what I figure it would work out to be.

I could be completely wrong though.

A.
It adds up to 100% of the time because if we don't pick up the blinds that means he called.

You're thinking way too hard about the rest of it. If you were villain and saw our hand face up, what hands would you call with?