Anyone got any counter arguements to the number of tables played when moving up?
Answer:

. Playing one table can be bad if you suffer from 'fold boredom'.
I said play less because i'm not thinking about things enough when I play 6, so moving up and playing 6 is pointless (and potentially roll-destroying). I went from 6 to 4 and should probably be playing 2 or 3 until I improve processing my thoughts in-play and observing my opponents, but 4 is gonna have to do else i'd get bored.

I think others suggested playing less tables just because you aren't comfortable with the value of money at 5nl yet, so you're risking less being at 1 table.

Either way you've gotta say to yourself: how much can I afford to lose and am I likely to do better or worse playing fewer tables.