I disagree. I think this is assuming the
villain is at all profitable. If this is the type of player that I am aware of, it is the type that will bet bet bet, whenever they stay in a hand. I love these players as I just wait out hands that I hit
post-
flop and
call their
flop,
turn, and
river. However I do agree, their
range is probably slightly smaller shoving all in; though not to the extent of being a good
range, or even a decent
range as listed above. I'
m thinking 22+ any 4 that he'd play preflop, and a variety of hands that include some with
mid pair, etc etc. but with lowering frequency. that is: I
don't think this is a definite:
villain plays this hand the same every time; so I think even in defining a
range we're making calculation errors.
That being said!!!!
Fold flop...
Fold turn...
Fold river...
At 5NL we aren't doing our EV any favors by assuming our 2nd
pair 2nd
kicker is good. Get your money in better. even against a
random range, over 22 hands we can't ASSUME he is this type of player. And we won't likely see him around long enough to know. I think the weakest I'
m stacking off here to this
villain is A9. And that's definitely not all the time, and not likely after only 22 hands.
Also, I'
m not sure exactly how Afq is calculated, but he isn't likely bet bet
shove every hand, probably mild bets in a
range of situations. And I
don't think his Afq would be affected if he were OOP and folded to a bet. So this isn't necessarily the type of player I am thinking of.
Maybe he bets every
street, and indeed this bet does look desperate, but I
don't think we can expect to profit doing this. Let him
bluff at you when you have a
made hand. especially after this hand, assuming you
call call fold, he's likely to take this
line again. do it with the
nuts man (obviously
call call rai ).
No
stats to
back this one up. I think we are making WAY too many assumptions when trying to put him on a
river shove range; given his
stats and the few amount of hands.