"you're risking a lower amount of your money to win a greater amount than you would playing as a big stack."

This doesn't really make any sense. If I have $20, end up all-in with A-A, how am I risking less than if I bet the same amount with a full stack?

Besides, only giving yourself a certain amount to risk at the table is more of a hindrance than it is a benefit. Sometimes you *want* to risk a lot. What happens when you flop set over set, but only find yourself with $20 to bet on the hand? Is it wise to risk lost profits in favor of the ease of just going all-in with "decent" hands?

It seems like this is just an excuse to make poker easier and not have to worry about making decisions on the turn and river, or risk losing a sizable stack.