I have read a lot of your posts Jeffery and I see many people pointing out that a min buy-in is bad. I have varying opinions on it.

I tend to do min buy-ins when I'm playing LaGGier. I feel that I'm not as shy to call some pre-flop raises as I am when max stacked.

Let me ask you this, specifically: Are you looser with your preflop calls and starting hand requirements? Do "chase" more when short stacked? What about post-flop opening? Do you feel that a short stack is less feared and people are more "apt" to call you when you open or push?

What about bluffing? Do you feel it has effectiveness when short, as compared to deep?

I see the value in short play. To me, it allows you to play riskier, without denting your BR. Do you use this short buyin mentality to be more risky?

Big stacked, I'm camping a little more. More tight play.. Trying not to get into betting wars with an unsure hand, etc. Short, I'll (for lack of a better word) gamb00l more and make plays similar to deep tourney where I'm trying to bulldoze.

Thanks for any insight. I enjoy both buy ins and it certainly has an effect on "how" I play, at any stakes.