What Are they? I've heard them mentioned before but I have no idea what anyone is talking about. I understand pot odds and implied odds so I'm guessing it's some sort of continuation, could someone epand for me?
11-01-2004 10:49 PM
#1
| |
Reverse Implied Odds?What Are they? I've heard them mentioned before but I have no idea what anyone is talking about. I understand pot odds and implied odds so I'm guessing it's some sort of continuation, could someone epand for me? | |
11-02-2004 03:19 AM
#2
| |
I hate this term because it's so convoluted and pretty much common sense, but here goes. | |
11-02-2004 03:29 PM
#3
| |
|
the way i understand it. it can also mean things such as, say I am playing A-8 suited. pretty much most useful as a nut flush draw, but i hit a pair of aces with no suited to my flush. if i cant get away from this hand i consider it something like reverse implied odds. something like that at least maybe. hands that dont form the nuts but a mediocre hand |
11-02-2004 03:56 PM
#4
| |
| |
11-02-2004 06:48 PM
#5
| |
Thanks for the detailed explanations | |
12-02-2004 12:54 PM
#6
| |
Fnord's last example ... why is it a better example?What draw are you worried about your opponent being on when the board is showing 2s, 5s, 6h when you're holding the pockets 8s? Obviously, there's the flush draw risk for spades and associated reverse implied odds for you if your opponent hits. Its also obvious to me that when it comes down to it, you cannot improve with your pocket 8s relative to a possible flush. | |
12-02-2004 01:04 PM
#7
| |
Re: Fnord's last example ... why is it a better example?
| |
12-02-2004 01:10 PM
#8
| |
Re: Fnord's last example ... why is it a better example?
| |
| |
12-02-2004 01:40 PM
#9
| |
Re: Fnord's last example ... why is it a better example?
| |
12-02-2004 01:46 PM
#10
| |
Re: Fnord's last example ... why is it a better example?
| |
| |
12-02-2004 03:01 PM
#11
| |
Ok, I do see the straight potential, but ......I of course do see the straight potential for opponent(s) in the pocket 8s example, but I did not include that in my assessment of the extent of the reverse implied odds (RIOs) against pocket 8s. | |
12-02-2004 03:43 PM
#12
| |
Re: Ok, I do see the straight potential, but ...... | |
12-02-2004 03:45 PM
#13
| |
Re: Ok, I do see the straight potential, but ......*double post* | |