|  | 
			
			
			
			
				 retarded lines
				
					
						What's your standard in spots like these? Should I just assume villain is an idiot and not pay off until proven otherwise or should I assume they're at least applying basic logic? 
 Example 1:
 
 only 10 hands on villain, not sure when exactly this hand occurred in the 10.
 
 Stacks:
 UTG  Hero ($98.70)
 UTG+1  jerper ($52.75)
 CO  palnuts ($13.60)
 BTN  niirr10 ($23)
 SB  mspt ($52.75)
 BB  krajet ($100.20)
 
 Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 6 players) Hero is UTG
    Hero raises to $1.75, jerper calls $1.75, 1 fold, niirr10 calls $1.75, 1 fold, krajet calls $1.25
 
 Flop:
      ($7.25, 4 players) krajet checks, Hero bets $4, jerper raises to $12, 1 fold, krajet folds, Hero goes all-in $96.95
 
 if he has 55/22 I don't expect him to raise like the driest board ever. K5s/K2s heavily discounted because I have a K and people don't usually flat with these hands (esp in MP vs UTG raises)
 
 Example 2:
 
 only 10 hands on villain
 
 $0.25/$0.50  No Limit Holdem
 FullTiltPoker
 5 Players
 Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
 
 Stacks:
 UTG  Kimlago ($80.40)
 CO  Pistolo14 ($16.50)
 BTN  ArghBlahr ($52.50)
 SB  ki191919 ($51.85)
 BB  Hero ($50)
 
 Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 5 players) Hero is BB
    3 folds, ki191919 raises to $1.50, Hero calls $1
 
 Flop:
      ($3, 2 players) ki191919 checks, Hero checks
 
 Turn:
  ($3, 2 players) ki191919 bets $0.50, Hero calls $0.50
 
 River:
  ($4, 2 players) ki191919 bets $9, Hero calls $9
 
 He looks incredibly weak up until river and then he overbets? wtf is this?
 |