|
|
 Originally Posted by jackvance
Also I think the timespan in which you play your 10k should be considered. If you force 10k hands in two days, it'll be less representational of your long term potential than if it takes two weeks. Because you might be on an unusual " roll" or way too tense and play under your potential if you just look at 2 days. But 2 weeks should average this out more too.
Statistically speaking, a sample size is a sample size, 2 days for 10k hands [which would be ridiculous, something like 8-tabling 6max for 6 hours a day] or 1 year for 10k hands and you can still have the same statistical variance.
Anyways though, on a sidenote at lower limits [ie. $25NL and down] is seat/table selection that important? I know in any case it will help, but if Im playing $10nl at party, should I really be worried about where I am sitting?
|
Reply With Quote