|
Wow, a lot of solid replies already.
I should have prefaced the original post by saying that I'm not frustrated by the player so much as what the underlying admission is behind the strategy. It really just seems like playing not to lose, instead of playing to win.
Let's suppose you had to play Phil Ivey HU.
What would be your best strategy?
The best strategy is exactly what he's doing.
If everyone at the table hates him, then don't fight each other to take him out either.
That's another part of the problem. When we're at a shorthanded table, I try to raise his blinds or re-raise when he enters a pot in order to isolate him. Unfortunately, a lot of other players wind up splashing around as well more often than I'd like.
Maybe you could all beat him before it gets to the final two if you are all bettter players
HAHAHA, see above. And it's not very often that he'll make it to heads up play, but when he does, it's because he's improbably sucked out on many different players with nothing more than six outers or so.
The only reason I don't like these guys is that probability dictates they'll wind up giving their chips to someone else.
SO VERY TRUE.
By the way - does he show his cards? How do you _know_ he is only going all in with solid hands?
Actually, yes. In fact, most recently when I would show the occassional bluff all in raise after he completed the BB from the button and then folded once I pushed, he would begin to show the hands he pushed pre-flop with, or the "big" laydowns he'd make on a flop that didn't connect with him.
Sure you will not win everytime, but this is the nature of poker, it is a long term game, and you should win more then you lose against him.
Which is the case (not to toot my own horn). But it's also the idea of him being a little humble and recognizing the hand of God came into play when hitting all the two and six outers to make it there. But like gengar said, they're everywhere and you can beat them over the head with odds and expected value and it doesn't make a lick of difference.
Rondavu, you hit the nail on the head, though. Playing good cards and easily giving away the strength of the hand with an abundance of physical tells is his MO. The last time he and I were heads up, I did a lot of what everyone hgre has said: Raise with pretty much any two cards, keep the raise amounts consistent (usually 2.5 - 3xBB), occassionally fold my small blind to him when I was to act first, and throw in a flat call or two. It really just became such a chore after a while, but I guess that's part of the grind.
I have another question along some of the same lines though. A couple of weeks ago a player lost an all-in bet that left him with about 1.5BB. It was heads up and he was to post the BB, so he went all-in dark. His opponent looked at the cards he was dealt and said that it wasn't even worth it and folded his small blind. Now with over 98% of the chips on the table, should it have been an automatic call for the player who folded? I thought that mathematically it would be, and to a certain extent, out of courtesy as well. A lot of people disagreed with me.
Thanks again for all the great responses, everyone. This is why FTR rules and I'm really hoping to get involved again.
|