|
|
 Originally Posted by Deanglow
Originally Posted by LuckySlevin
Theres a good article by Alex Rousso 'I'd rather be lucky than good' in this months bluff magazine, he says you need to have played about 500,000 hands to get a fair reflection of how well your doing in cash games, if your a 'not very' aggressive player.
Also bear in mind that the more aggressive your style of play the greater the fluctuations will be.
You need to stop getting poker knowledge from such shitty sources.
100,000 hands is often enough, "aggressive" player or not.
Well, 100K hands of crushing
100K hands of 0.5PTBB/100 doesn't mean you're a winning player which was the point of the article
|
Reply With Quote