Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Question about moving to 50NL (Full vs. Short)

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Default Question about moving to 50NL (Full vs. Short)

    I'll be moving up to 50NL shortly, and I'd like to know if the short-handed games are way better than full games since I hear so many people whine about how nitty 50NL is. Does 6/5 max make a big difference or is it all a nitfest? Anyone have experience with Ongame 5-max 50NL? That's most likely where I'll be when I make the move.
    Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
  2. #2
    Short-handed is ...... different.
  3. #3
    oh ok thanks
    Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
    Here's the deal. SH you can play less good hands. If this appeals, go for it; if you're a nut peddler and it scares you rigid, maybe warm up by opening up your hands at FR first.

    SH you get about 50% more hands in. If you can keep the same winrate that equates to 50% more profit. That's why you should play SH.
  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by biondino
    Here's the deal. SH you can play less good hands. If this appeals, go for it; if you're a nut peddler and it scares you rigid, maybe warm up by opening up your hands at FR first.

    SH you get about 50% more hands in. If you can keep the same winrate that equates to 50% more profit. That's why you should play SH.
    Posts like this are the reason the SH games are so good.
  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord
    Quote Originally Posted by biondino
    Here's the deal. SH you can play less good hands. If this appeals, go for it; if you're a nut peddler and it scares you rigid, maybe warm up by opening up your hands at FR first.

    SH you get about 50% more hands in. If you can keep the same winrate that equates to 50% more profit. That's why you should play SH.
    Posts like this are the reason the SH games are so good.
    So you're saying I need to move up stakes and 8 table SH games?
    She looked at me and said youz a baby right?
    I told her, I'm 18 and live a crazy life
    Plus I'll tell you what the 80's like
    And I know what ladies like
  7. #7
    Maybe Fnord can correct me, but I think he's saying...Stay with what you're good at because too many people rush into 6max seeing the $$$ from playing more hands and lose (or don't have the same wr at full ring) because they are blinded by that and don't adjust properly.
  8. #8
    Enlighten us Fnord? I think I've read around here that you don't have to loosen up as much as everyone thinks to make money at 6-max. ilikeaces gave a pretty wide pre-flop stat range that he thinks can be profitable, but the low end was around 15/8, which is pretty tight. Is this what you mean?
  9. #9
    Zook pretty much nailed it.

    6-max drives otherwise rational players to give crazy action with wreckless disreguard as to who they're playing against.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •