Okay, you have a villain who is aggressive with A10+, suited conns (esp broadways) and pp 99+. I see villains act aggressive both in and out of position so you can freely switch position in these examples.

You raise with JJ and he calls. Flop is Ah 7s 9h. Right now trips & Ax have you beat and he is likely to have played any such hand. Plus he may also have a flush draw.

You bet and he calls or raises - where are you? Especially if he is very aggro, he can be raising with just the flush draw!

So at this point, what use is ranging to your decision making as it's quite a wide range . Or do you just go off equity & pot/implied odds (which to me seems to negate ranging in the first place)?

Had this been played in position, and he raised first, then you can add QQ and KK to the mix of hands that have you beat.

Another example is you have Ad Qd and raise. He calls. Flop is As 4c Jc. You bet, he calls. Turn is Qc. You bet he raises (or you check and he bets). Has he made the flush with suited broadways? Got AJ for a worse 2 pair? AK for a severely dominated TPTK? All of these are in his range up to this point.