Have been logging 1K hands a day at $2NL FR (12K hands so far) so this question is specifically related to that. However, there's a part B that carries over to $10NL.

Part A:
Assuming I don't get the oppty to push PF as a 3-bet, and assuming HU on the flop... I'm pushing with AA or KK on the flop under the following criteria:
- I'm bet into by villain (pretty much any size bet, including a push)
- My initial 1/2 PS bet is raised by villain
- The flop didn't 1) pair the board, 2) present 3 connectors or suited, 3) two broadway cards (trying to avoid being dead to two pair with somone running AQ-AT or KQ-KT)

With the stacks inherent to $2NL (and any decent PF action) pushing seems the right alternative to any other meaningful raise as I'm going to be pot-committed or have villain covered anyhow. Oh, and assume no reads. These tables turn over way too much to get a whole lot that's meaningful... and just about everyone seems to be running 35+ anyway...

Does this make sense for $2NL?

BTW... 11 out of 14 times doing this so far I've lost... to made sets, two pair, flushes and one wierd-ass inside straight draw dealio. I'm asking the question 'cause I know the sample's too small to be relevant and I won't have a better view until around 150K hands.

Part B:
I don't see this as making sense for $10NL because of more deep stacks and slightly more aware play. If I'm significantly re-raised or pushed at on the flop, I'm liable to fold with AA-KK only as I'm assuming more of a made hand (set, two pair, etc). I realize I may lose out to QQ-TT overs but the odds seem a little more stacked against me. It's either get it all-in PF, or be much less willing to push it unimproved post-.

Does this make sense?