|
 Originally Posted by tugger
I agree that KJ is often ahead of most limping ranges, I just don't believe it's beating most UTG limps. Unless I have notes on a player, I assume an UTG limp is a decent hand, such as AT+, KQ, 22+ or maybe a suited raggy ace. I would imagine most people who know what they're doing will be folding KT, QJ, TJ and stuff like this UTG. Hence I tighten my range when UTG limps in.
This is just an incorrect generalization imo. Sure, people limp strong hands from EP; however, I believe this is the exception, and not the standard. The majority of poker players are losing players, so until proven otherwise, I treat them as such. And losing players have a tendency to limp poor hands just to see a flop. This particular villain without reads could be limping KT, QJ, QT, A5, 87, K6, etc. So to not isolate on his very wide limping range, and build a pot in position with a superior hand to his range, seems well bad.
Now with reads, then sure you can adjust here. If you've seen villain limp/raise before, then sure you will want to strengthen your isolating range. If villain seems very competent, playing pretty well, then comes in for an open limp UTG, sure you can be suspicious, and play accordingly. But to just assume that everyone is competent enough to fold KT, QJ, etc UTG, and to not limp/call those hands, but instead of only limp strong hands from EP with the intention of raising is bad.
Also, as a side note, I really dislike that you said you limp/raise your monsters from UTG. It's so very transparent of a play, that even bad players can catch on to that. Good players will insta-muck some fairly strong hands to a limp/raise, and the bad players would have called an open raise to begin with. In essence, limp/raising any hand (without a very solid situation) seems like a less than ideal way to play nowadays imo.
|