03-22-2004 02:09 PM
#1
| |
| |
03-22-2004 02:38 PM
#2
| |
Hey Linker33, | |
03-22-2004 02:38 PM
#3
| |
03-22-2004 04:10 PM
#4
| |
|
I personally don't even like to play A or K-x suited, even on the button, maybe from the small blind, and maybe if there are a lot of callers or I think im on a roll. Basically I feel if i'm just going to play these hoping for that flush, I might as well play many other suited cards. (However I am quite fond of suited connectors, those hands have a lot of potential). Another exception might be A-2-5, because of the flush and straight possibility, but if you make a straight with A-5 or sometimes A-4, you have to be careful cause theres a reasonable chance you are up against a higher straight. I'm really not comfortable with such a low kicker. |
03-31-2004 08:09 AM
#5
| |
I see ttanka posted his revised grouping. Comments about ranking hands aside, I still think it's too limit centric. | |
03-31-2004 09:38 AM
#6
| |
| |
03-31-2004 09:44 AM
#7
| |
I like to raise aqo to like to 1.50 or 200. Just because it really helps me to see how everyone else reacts. This way i know what to do if someone reraise or if a king flops. | |
03-31-2004 12:52 PM
#8
| |
|
yes, in a cash game, its a sure raise most of the time |
03-31-2004 04:26 PM
#9
| |
| |
04-01-2004 02:59 AM
#10
| |
Fnord, | |
04-01-2004 03:29 AM
#11
| |
| |
04-01-2004 09:23 AM
#12
| |
| |
| |
04-01-2004 04:03 PM
#13
| |
Yeah, I agree, it's tough to put a strict ranking on hands in holdem, especially no limit. So much depends on so much. Just like the riddle between 22, AK, 98s, right? | |