Practical..... Highest Possible Winrate at any stakes?

Let us say someone like Hollingol moves down to 2 NL, he spends 2 years there and has extensive reads on almost all the players there.

What would his winrate be? I mean is it possible he could obtain something like 50BB/100 hands? Maybe even 100BB?150BB?200BB!!!

probably 30-40 as a maximum

Hall might even be a losing player at 2nl.

But I am more interested in whar are your currents winrates
and what stakes?

T.

400nl full ring party 4ptbb/100

Originally Posted by Turska

But I am more interested in whar are your currents winrates
and what stakes?

T.

43bb/100 at .25/.25 pot limit over last 1k hands. Thats sustainable, right??

25bb/100 at 600 nl, i got out of the game after everyone folded around to me on the first hand

Originally Posted by TerryToma

Originally Posted by Turska

But I am more interested in whar are your currents winrates
and what stakes?

T.

43bb/100 at .25/.25 pot limit over last 1k hands. Thats sustainable, right??

Yeah, if it drops below 40 I'd seriously start rethinking whether poker is for you.

Originally Posted by Rockymv

Originally Posted by TerryToma

Originally Posted by Turska

But I am more interested in whar are your currents winrates
and what stakes?

T.

43bb/100 at .25/.25 pot limit over last 1k hands. Thats sustainable, right??

Yeah, if it drops below 40 I'd seriously start rethinking whether poker is for you.

Hahaha

My main stake is £25NL and in the last 17,000 hands or so I am round about 9PTBB/100. It's a shame I can't manage the same in $50, £50, $100 or even $25....

Just a situation im in.

I play .01/.02 that is normally called 2NL, but at the site i play at the maximum buy in is $5. This is absolutely massive in terms of my winrate. I have made heaps in stackings with showdowns, and if the max buy in was $2, I think i would just about halve my winrate (130bb/100, yes very streaky so far) so hypothetically i could be at 60-70bb/100 with $2 stacks and then with downswings and quieter times, average that 30bb/100 at 2NL that people talk about. But at NL with .01/.02 blinds with $5 buy ins, surely that maximum figure now just about doubles.

Anyone have any thoughts on this?

Originally Posted by Biondino

My main stake is £25NL and in the last 17,000 hands or so I am round about 9PTBB/100. It's a shame I can't manage the same in $50, £50, $100 or even $25....

Have you considered the fact that you only need to make 4.5PTBB/100 to be making the same. And even a 5PTBB/100 at £50 would be an improvement.

I have considered it time after time, dude!

Biondino = COMPLETE FUCKIN' PUSSY

(also, at $50NL I am below 3BB/100; at £50 I am well into the red - both with fairly small sample sizes, admittedly, especially the latter)

Originally Posted by givememyleg

Hall might even be a losing player at 2nl.

Assuming he doesnt adjust, and as his game is incredibly versatile thats pretty unlikely.

I think the biggest winner at the lower stakes would be a player like Lolo who plays an incredible solid TAGG game, at the microstakes a lagg is going to be spewing pulling a lot of the moves they depend on.

I have run 14 BB/100 for months at 25 PL/NL. Tracked hands 50 k played a lot more. My PT started to run very slowly so I dont use that anymore.

I have played some 50NL/100NL during summer but
not enough to say what my accurate winrate is. I
think its about 5 BB / 100.

I'm kind of pulling # out of my ass, but...

When I was clearing bonuses on Boss media sites, the 10NL is terrible. I made ~$100 everytime for 1k raked hands. At 3-4 different sites.

So, say 2/3 hands are raked, that means I was making 66bb/100 over 4k ish hands.

Call bullshit if you like, but a couple players on that site loved to give away stacks. On a typical 4 tables I would break even on 1, make a decent win-rate (5-10bb/100) on 2 and be +2 buyins on the fourth.

Sustainable? I have no idea.

{EDIT: I'm going to pull my guess back to 50bb/100. It's not PT supported and I didn't have tracking software at the time anyway}

I run 7.5PTBB/100 at $50NL after 26k hands. Getting ready to move up soon....just working on my pf raising and post flop play for a bit and then I'm gonna move to $100nl. At $25NL I was 11PTBB/100, 27k hands. I don't think either of these are the best possible, but I would guess that they are certainly better than average.

"7.5PTBB/100" I'm new to poker, and all this lingo is getting me confused. How is your winrate calculated?what does PTBB mean? how much PBTB/100 is a decent winrate?

Thanks for replyin!

Originally Posted by maverickai

"7.5PTBB/100" I'm new to poker, and all this lingo is getting me confused. How is your winrate calculated?what does PTBB mean? how much PBTB/100 is a decent winrate?

Thanks for replyin!

PT is Poker Tracker. It is a software program that tracks your play and auto calculates any stat you would want to have. One of them is winrate, which is expressed in BB/100. When people quote their winrate, it is usually from PT, which translates to Poker Tracker Big Bets per 100 hands. A big bet is twice the big blind, therefore at $50nl, 7.5PTBB/100 means I win $7.5 per 100 hands on average. PTBB/100 and BB/100 usually mean the same thing when posted here. bb/100 usually means big blinds per 100, however.

Originally Posted by maverickai

"7.5PTBB/100" I'm new to poker, and all this lingo is getting me confused. How is your winrate calculated?what does PTBB mean? how much PBTB/100 is a decent winrate?

Thanks for replyin!

http://www.flopturnriver.com/phpBB2/...oker-13407.htm

Originally Posted by andy-akb

Originally Posted by givememyleg

Hall might even be a losing player at 2nl.

Assuming he doesnt adjust, and as his game is incredibly versatile thats pretty unlikely.

I think the biggest winner at the lower stakes would be a player like Lolo who plays an incredible solid TAGG game, at the microstakes a lagg is going to be spewing pulling a lot of the moves they depend on.

I think on low stakes the SLAG's are gonna make the most money.Everytime i see a player like that hes up alot.

The best players IMO are the GOOD super loose aggressives. Anyone can limp into a pot at anytime and push all in on the flop.

The best possible winrate depends on the # of hands played and the limits. Most FTR players could rake in 100BB/100 hands @ 1 cent 2 cent. @ 10,000NL, a good winrate would probably be 2bb/100.