Post the lowest VP$IP of any player...

I want to see what the tightest player you've played against (or your own) VP$IP just for interest sake.

dentedghost on PS, on 183 hands he's 4.23

That's the lowest I found on my PT.

see my pt 10k post for my personal lowest

i've got a guy at PS who's 6.3.

Madum on PP

83 hands ... 3.23/0

>100 hands: 5.17 (174 hands)

I have a guy with 113 hands at Party, 50NL; 0.88VP$IP, 0.88 PFR.

What did I win?

Originally Posted by HalvSame

I have a guy with 113 hands at Party, 50NL; 0.88VP$IP, 0.88 PFR.

What did I win?

did he make money on his AA? :P

Originally Posted by jackvance

Originally Posted by HalvSame

I have a guy with 113 hands at Party, 50NL; 0.88VP$IP, 0.88 PFR.

What did I win?

did he make money on his AA? :P

Ironically, the only hand shown down was 94o. Lucky bastard flopped trip nines and won a small pot.

haha

tight is good, very good

I have annea1226 on Party

103 hands, VP$IP 1.94%

Master_Yeung on Prima 101 hands 3.96%

Originally Posted by HalvSame

Originally Posted by jackvance

Originally Posted by HalvSame

I have a guy with 113 hands at Party, 50NL; 0.88VP$IP, 0.88 PFR.

What did I win?

did he make money on his AA? :P

Ironically, the only hand shown down was 94o. Lucky bastard flopped trip nines and won a small pot.

lol. Big blind special? Actually that wouldn't make any sense because his VPIP and PFR are identical, unless it checked through on all 3 streets and he raised somewhere else (probably KK/AA) and won without showdown.

Originally Posted by Lukie

lol. Big blind special? Actually that wouldn't make any sense because his VPIP and PFR are identical, unless it checked through on all 3 streets and he raised somewhere else (probably KK/AA) and won without showdown.

There's no reason why identical VP$IP and PFR would imply that the hand would have been checked down, is there? They both apply to preflop only, don't they? His aggression factor, on the other hand, would be affected. Sure enough, it is a mighty 0.00.

On popular demand, I have further investigated the matter. My findings are intriguing: in the 94o hand he was indeed in the BB, the fun part is that he cracked a limped AA. He checked top trips, check-called a small turn bet, and checked the river.

The hand in which he raised, he pushed AI (for 20BB) from UTG+1 with a limper in front. The limper folded, giving him his second and last winning session of the 13 sessions I have with him. In total he is down 6.50$ or 5.84ptBB/100 from blinds.

On a different note,

Originally Posted by I Like Pie

dentedghost on PS, on 183 hands he's 4.23

I wonder if this is the same guy as ghostdented on PokerRoom, if so he might be getting more involved, I have him at 10.05 over 209 hands.

i have master yeung from prima, hes actually a 12/4 player. Seriously, over like 1.2k hands....

.88% is unbelieveable.

Originally Posted by IowaSkinsFan

.88% is unbelieveable.

He's probably not that tight in "real life", I've only got a bunch of sessions with ~10 hands length on him. It's not like he sat there and folded 100 hands straight . But funny nonetheless.

Ultimate George: 0/0/0.

Sample size 10,000 hands.

Originally Posted by Lukie

Ultimate George: 0/0/0.

Sample size 10,000 hands.

isn't that like the pot calling the kettle black??

meh, the pot is a lightish brown/gray. The kettle, well shit, that is like pure, dark midnight night.

Correction, I do remember George playing ONE hand in particular. He raises a very tight limper with QQ, gets repopped behind, and then this very tight player goes allin for over 100bb with the most blatantly obvious AA in the history of online poker. George makes a heroic call with only 4bb invested, and of course luckbox's his Q on the flop. QQQ > AA. I can't remember, but I think he got blinded out of his 200bb++ stack after that.

On a more serious note,

I remember back when I used to play NL100 full ring on stars, there were a few semi-regulars that had stats something like 9/2. As 'nitty' as I used to be, the tightest I ever really played was something like 15/7. At one point it may have been like 13/6 for a stretch, but that was as a relative newb while 8-tabling full ring.

Tightest FTR player I know - a chap called Satan1974 who hasn't posted here for a while After 600 hands against him he's 7/3 - up from 5/3 after 400 hands...

(and yes, he is a winning player. Fuck knows how, mind)

It's because he plays at Crypto and they don't give a crap how tight you are when you bet - they will still reraise/push their flush draws at you...

Originally Posted by "HalvSame

Originally Posted by I Like Pie

dentedghost on PS, on 183 hands he's 4.23

I wonder if this is the same guy as ghostdented on PokerRoom, if so he might be getting more involved, I have him at 10.05 over 209 hands.

Ya, I have ghostdented at about 9/1 as well. Faintinggoat on PR is around the same. Some guy named Spykon I ran into was 6/4....

Originally Posted by cardsman1992

Originally Posted by "HalvSame

Originally Posted by I Like Pie

dentedghost on PS, on 183 hands he's 4.23

I wonder if this is the same guy as ghostdented on PokerRoom, if so he might be getting more involved, I have him at 10.05 over 209 hands.

Ya, I have ghostdented at about 9/1 as well. Faintinggoat on PR is around the same. Some guy named Spykon I ran into was 6/4....

Yeah, I know them both. PR is chocked full of tighties in various formats.

Guarantee I'm not one of them LOL...I'm sure I have the fish next to my name

Lol, since you bring it up, my PT autorates you as Weak/Tight with auto rate rules from betthepot. I can't imagine what yours says about me after that horrible session I played on your table yesterday .

I always considered myself a little bit aggressive.....guess I gotta ramp it up

I will look when I get home to see what you are. If I am not mistaken, my last autorate has you as a rock, but thats with PT rules. Bet the pot rules better????

Originally Posted by cardsman1992

Bet the pot rules better?

I'm not sure, as I never really used the default ones. The ones I'm currently using (not from the BTP articles, I think I got them from the BTP forum) don't take PFR into account, so they're more geared towards post flop play.

An auto rate symbol is only going to tell you a piece of the story anyway, when playing I have the most important stats on the HUD to better pinpoint the format of fish/rock/etc I'm dealing with (not that I take them into enough consideration, that's a huge leak right there). But I like the icons for aiding me in decisions of wether I should leave a table etc.

Edit: and I haven't got that many hands on you btw, so don't go rushing into changing your game or anything. It sure looked like you were playing the table well .

Just downloaded the btp rules, thought I would try them out. We're both TAGs....that's with 200 hands on you. Didn't know about not taking PFR into account, that will be interesting.

See ya there, bud!!

iwin9966 (PTY) = played 111 ... 1.8%

For his only voluntarily played hand, he open raised all-in from MP with JJ and got called By some bone with AQo and took it down HUGE!!!

I avoided him after that....well not hard to do.

Pokerstars 100nl full ring
Hands : 5269
Vpip:5.87
Pfr:4.87
bb/100 15
Sn: Miffed22001

Originally Posted by Chicago_Kid

iwin9966 (PTY) = played 111 ... 1.8%

For his only voluntarily played hand, he open raised all-in from MP with JJ and got called By some bone with AQo and took it down HUGE!!!

I avoided him after that....well not hard to do.

Lol, this is my 0.88% guy! Looks like open pushing JJ+ is his game, then.

DJKALCON at 591 hands VI$IP 6.09 on PokerRoom Skins