Quote Originally Posted by Jiggus
This may slightly hijack the thread (can one be "slightly" hijacked?), but it's interesting to see Fnord's results (I'm assuming they're his), since my own example from a lower limt ($10 NL) would show you about 9,000 hands, with a BB/100 only a tad less than his (15.10/100) but a preflop raise percentage of about 5 times LESS.

I have been toying with the idea of being much more aggressive, (and I actually am a bit more aggressive than at $2 NL), but if the results are more or less equal, then it may not be worth changing my style at the moment?

I dunno, what does anyone think? I think that the quality of opponents has a lot to do with your needed aggression factor, no?

For instance, in a sit n' go I played -- and won -- a couple of days ago, being aggressive past the mid-way point worked a charm. But in my ring games, playing that style would be foolish, since moronic callers would defeat the purpose of it.
Fnord plays at totally different tables where they are (presumably) much tighter. Keep to your style while the major mistake is calling too much. Once you find tables where people fold too much then get with the raising.