|
|
 Originally Posted by melinda27
Originally Posted by ensign_lee
Originally Posted by melinda27
13000 hands is nothing, i wouldnt pay attention to any pokertracker stats till at least 100k hands, even that is a fairly small sample.
Are you serious? I can't tell.
13,000 hands I think is a pretty substantial sample size. That means I should have been dealt most hands something like 30x now...
fairly serious....50K at the minimum. It takes a while to let the #'s play out.
edit: i try to play about 750-1000 hands a day and I can run good or bad for 2 weeks at a time easily, but over the course of a month/6 weeks it all ends up evening out to give you a real idea of how well you play
This all depends on what you're looking at. If your trying to determine if you're a winning player or not then 13k hands is just sufficient to give you a good idea (although it could still be way off because of a long string of unusual luck), but it won't tell you an accurate bb/hour. If you're trying to determine if you are seeing too many flops then it's overkill. If you are trying to see if you are aggresive enough then it's also large enough as long as you're not trying to fine tune to an exact number.
However, it is not even close to being large enough to determine which hands are profitable. How a particular hand preformed after being dealt only 30 times tells you nothing. You could bust your pocket kings just twice and that could put you in the red.
|
Reply With Quote