Holdem poker for advanced players? or No Limit holdem theory and practice?
03-02-2009 06:36 PM
#1
| |
| |
03-02-2009 06:45 PM
#2
| |
T&P | |
03-02-2009 06:52 PM
#3
| |
Ty stacks my good sir | |
| |
03-02-2009 06:54 PM
#4
| |
| |
03-02-2009 06:59 PM
#5
| |
I'll be reading ToP next week. I tried reading it once a while back, but it was in e-book form, and I couldn't stand it. And on top of that, I had absolutely no interest in learning anything except about NLHE. Basically I didn't understand the point of the book and the importance of theory. I wanted to learn how to play NLHE, and what actions to take when, not how to think. I won't make that mistake again. Really looking forward to reading/studying ToP, PNL, and Mathematics of Poker next week. | |
03-03-2009 03:33 AM
#6
| |
Yeah, Theory of Poker is a definite candidate for a first read. And I haven't read that many other ones so feel free to correct me, but Super System was the first book I read and I thought it was pretty insightful as long as you know the basic basics. | |
03-03-2009 03:49 AM
#7
| |
I guess you're playing NL | |
03-03-2009 04:35 PM
#8
| |
| |
| |
03-03-2009 05:01 PM
#9
| |
03-03-2009 05:10 PM
#10
| |
Just picked up ToP after im done with it i plan on getting Theory and Practice. Then after that PNL then read the 3 again ^_^ | |
| |
03-03-2009 05:40 PM
#11
| |
Yes, reread, that's what a lot of poker players miss out on is the fact that once they read it once they think they are done. But certain things may not have applied to you the first time so the 2nd time through they pick up those things. | |
03-03-2009 05:47 PM
#12
| |
Guest
|
|
03-03-2009 06:23 PM
#13
| |
| |
03-03-2009 06:42 PM
#14
| |
| |
| |
03-03-2009 07:10 PM
#15
| |
![]() ![]()
|
The Theory of Poker is the best place to start and is good regardless of what you play. For NLHE, both No Limit Theory and Practice and Professional No Limit Hold 'Em are good. Theory and Practice being a good overview and Professional No Limit Hold 'Em having a very good section on Stack to Pot Ratios. |
03-03-2009 09:13 PM
#16
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
03-03-2009 11:03 PM
#17
| |
I think the Little Green Book is a fine read. It's probably in the camp of good first books to read as in it's not as complicated as "No Limit Theory and Practice" or "Professional No Limit", but that's not to say it's ABC easy either or that the information is basic or should be overlooked. Phil has some very sound and specific advice, but it's more from a "This is how I play" point of view rather than "This is the theory and how you should think" point of view. It's a fun, easy read and great way to jump in with both feet. As No Limit goes, I'd probably recommend it 2nd after the Theory of Poker because it sets up nicely. Don't get me wrong, though, "No Limit Theory and Practice" or "Professional No Limit" are currently the gold standard as no limit goes for the serious player in my opinion, but it helps to have played a while I think before delving into those. | |
| |
03-04-2009 10:56 AM
#18
| |
![]() ![]()
|
ToP definately, then after awhile of playing I'd say NLHT&P. Becuase you will understand it better if you have a basis to look at it and be able to filter what applies to what. I'd maybe even read Fees ebook before this and then reread both in succession again. |
| |
03-04-2009 12:00 PM
#19
| |
Here is a great link to reviews on almost every poker book out there. It is a personal oppinion review but it is very informative. check it out | |
| |
03-04-2009 03:03 PM
#20
| |
| |
03-04-2009 05:42 PM
#21
| |
So how far are you into ToP schya? | |
| |
03-04-2009 05:58 PM
#22
| |
Well just picked it up, so far im at chapter 3. Just finished chapter 2 as we speak haha. | |
| |
03-04-2009 06:24 PM
#23
| |
Same! I won't be able to get past Chapter 3 until tomorrow though cause I have school tonight | |
| |
03-04-2009 06:37 PM
#24
| |
Im sitting at 4 2NL tables while the fiance reads her book. More than likely i'll read some after a bit. | |
| |
03-04-2009 11:44 PM
#25
| |
| |
| |
03-05-2009 01:04 AM
#26
| |
Question for those avid readers out there: | |
03-05-2009 02:53 AM
#27
| |
| |
03-05-2009 09:28 AM
#28
| |
| |
| |
03-05-2009 02:21 PM
#29
| |
| |
03-05-2009 05:30 PM
#30
| |
| |
03-05-2009 06:08 PM
#31
| |
Meh, Theory of Poker IS a great book and should be required reading for all poker players, but eventually we have to branch out to the specifics of the game or games we like whether it's cash, tournaments or no limit, limit, Omaha, stud, or whatever. There's also branches of psychology and mindset, so there will never be one book to end all other books. But, most agree Theory of Poker is the best place to start. | |
| |
03-05-2009 09:01 PM
#32
| |
Anyone find Harrington on Cash Games to be a must read? | |
| |
03-05-2009 09:30 PM
#33
| |
![]() ![]()
| |
03-05-2009 09:47 PM
#34
| |
![]() ![]()
|
Wow, so many wonderful poker books! I will pick some for sharpening my poker skills. |
03-05-2009 09:59 PM
#35
| |
| |
03-05-2009 10:36 PM
#36
| |
| |
| |
03-05-2009 10:37 PM
#37
| |
finished chapter 3 today xpaand ^_^ yourself? | |
| |
03-06-2009 04:03 AM
#38
| |
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
03-06-2009 06:49 AM
#39
| |
Guest
|
|
03-06-2009 09:22 AM
#40
| |
I loved the HOH series so I don't see why HoCG should be any worse. It's set up the exact same as the HOH series with examples and what not. So far the book is good but i haven't read deep into the book so I can't give any solid feedback. I will definitely post my oppinion on the forum once I finish it. | |
| |