Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Which poker book to get first

Results 1 to 40 of 40
  1. #1

    Default Which poker book to get first

    Holdem poker for advanced players? or No Limit holdem theory and practice?
  2. #2
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    T&P
  3. #3
    Ty stacks my good sir
  4. #4
    "The Theory of Poker" is the best book on poker to read first in my opinion. "No Limit Theory and Practice" and "Professional No Limit" are excellent books to be read not once, but often, but are also relatively advanced and not one of the first poker books most players would want to read.
    - Jason

  5. #5
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    I'll be reading ToP next week. I tried reading it once a while back, but it was in e-book form, and I couldn't stand it. And on top of that, I had absolutely no interest in learning anything except about NLHE. Basically I didn't understand the point of the book and the importance of theory. I wanted to learn how to play NLHE, and what actions to take when, not how to think. I won't make that mistake again. Really looking forward to reading/studying ToP, PNL, and Mathematics of Poker next week.
  6. #6
    Yeah, Theory of Poker is a definite candidate for a first read. And I haven't read that many other ones so feel free to correct me, but Super System was the first book I read and I thought it was pretty insightful as long as you know the basic basics.
  7. #7
    I guess you're playing NL

    Theory of Poker is a must-read, no matter what game you play. After that you'd be better off using most poker books as kindling.
  8. #8
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    I guess you're playing NL

    Theory of Poker is a must-read, no matter what game you play. After that you'd be better off using most poker books as kindling.
    o rly?It's ok, I'm bringing it back!

    This is so out of line... this is like bluff 3betting a guy who runs 50/2/.3/1k

    First off, ToP is the bible. We can all agree about that. But HoH for tourney players? PNL or T&P for cash players?

    Why would you post this in a beginner's poker forum? That statement is just leading people in the wrong direction. ToP is a tough book to get thru, give the guys a break FFS.
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  9. #9
    Um...I think Harrington on Holdem and Sklansky would be a good choice as well. Most poker books say the same thing anyway. I would get one book for MTT and one for Cash as SnG really only change when you get down to Push/Fold and then just get SnG Wizard to train yourself on that.
  10. #10
    Just picked up ToP after im done with it i plan on getting Theory and Practice. Then after that PNL then read the 3 again ^_^
  11. #11
    Yes, reread, that's what a lot of poker players miss out on is the fact that once they read it once they think they are done. But certain things may not have applied to you the first time so the 2nd time through they pick up those things.

    Also I had the problem of plugging a leak only to make a new one just because I forgot about it so I would read them many times over maybe once every month or so before you get the full value out of them.
  12. #12
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ArcadianRock
    Um...I think Harrington on Holdem and Sklansky would be a good choice as well. Most poker books say the same thing anyway. I would get one book for MTT and one for Cash as SnG really only change when you get down to Push/Fold and then just get SnG Wizard to train yourself on that.
    Not really because even at 20 big blinds in your stack, you'll be willing to play for stacks with AQ preflop

    probably not for 100 big blinds, though
  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Schya
    Just picked up ToP after im done with it i plan on getting Theory and Practice. Then after that PNL then read the 3 again ^_^
    I'm gonna start reading ToP too so if you wanna discuss some things, feel free to PM me!
    OP: Beginner to Master

    If I bet as a bluff, I should be thinking "am I getting better hands to fold? Is it likely that he will fold x% of the time to a y sized bet to make it +EV?". If I bet for value, I should be thinking "am I getting worst hands to call? Am I ahead of enough of his range that this is a good value bet?".
  14. #14
    Quote Originally Posted by xpaand
    Quote Originally Posted by Schya
    Just picked up ToP after im done with it i plan on getting Theory and Practice. Then after that PNL then read the 3 again ^_^
    I'm gonna start reading ToP too so if you wanna discuss some things, feel free to PM me!
    Will do man, feel free to do the same.
  15. #15
    The Theory of Poker is the best place to start and is good regardless of what you play. For NLHE, both No Limit Theory and Practice and Professional No Limit Hold 'Em are good. Theory and Practice being a good overview and Professional No Limit Hold 'Em having a very good section on Stack to Pot Ratios.
  16. #16
    What's all of your views on the Little Green Book and the Little Blue Book by Gordon? I bought the Audio Green Book and was thinking of picking up the Little Blue one or Gus Hansons book.
  17. #17
    I think the Little Green Book is a fine read. It's probably in the camp of good first books to read as in it's not as complicated as "No Limit Theory and Practice" or "Professional No Limit", but that's not to say it's ABC easy either or that the information is basic or should be overlooked. Phil has some very sound and specific advice, but it's more from a "This is how I play" point of view rather than "This is the theory and how you should think" point of view. It's a fun, easy read and great way to jump in with both feet. As No Limit goes, I'd probably recommend it 2nd after the Theory of Poker because it sets up nicely. Don't get me wrong, though, "No Limit Theory and Practice" or "Professional No Limit" are currently the gold standard as no limit goes for the serious player in my opinion, but it helps to have played a while I think before delving into those.
    - Jason

  18. #18
    ToP definately, then after awhile of playing I'd say NLHT&P. Becuase you will understand it better if you have a basis to look at it and be able to filter what applies to what. I'd maybe even read Fees ebook before this and then reread both in succession again.

    PNL. Not a fan of in general. Not bad, but nothing great to me. Once your understand STP ratios the book loses me.
    NH, WP, GG, TY, Etc..........................
  19. #19
    Here is a great link to reviews on almost every poker book out there. It is a personal oppinion review but it is very informative. check it out

    http://cardsharp.org/category/book-reviews/
    ________________________________


    Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
  20. #20
    I won't make that mistake again. Really looking forward to reading/studying ToP, PNL, and Mathematics of Poker next week.
    Mathematics of Poker

    A chapter by chapter thread discussing the applicability of concepts you meet after the first couple of introductory chapters?

    I remember seeing a group reading thread started when I first joined here but I guess people lose interest?
  21. #21
    So how far are you into ToP schya?
    OP: Beginner to Master

    If I bet as a bluff, I should be thinking "am I getting better hands to fold? Is it likely that he will fold x% of the time to a y sized bet to make it +EV?". If I bet for value, I should be thinking "am I getting worst hands to call? Am I ahead of enough of his range that this is a good value bet?".
  22. #22
    Well just picked it up, so far im at chapter 3. Just finished chapter 2 as we speak haha.
  23. #23
    Same! I won't be able to get past Chapter 3 until tomorrow though cause I have school tonight
    OP: Beginner to Master

    If I bet as a bluff, I should be thinking "am I getting better hands to fold? Is it likely that he will fold x% of the time to a y sized bet to make it +EV?". If I bet for value, I should be thinking "am I getting worst hands to call? Am I ahead of enough of his range that this is a good value bet?".
  24. #24
    Im sitting at 4 2NL tables while the fiance reads her book. More than likely i'll read some after a bit.
  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    I guess you're playing NL

    Theory of Poker is a must-read, no matter what game you play. After that you'd be better off using most poker books as kindling.
    I am a student of this school of thought as well.

    It took me a year to unlearn a lot of the crap I learned in the HoH series. They are great for turning a beginner into a marginally losing player, but sngs/tournies are full of people treating HoH like the bible and handing the good players chip after chip after chip after.. you get the idea. For tournies I think Poker Tournament Formula is the best thing out there.

    For cash I am really enjoying Professional NL (the current book club book) although I think some of it is inaccurate. I learn more from watching FTR videos and studying my own HHs.

    Other than that.. for ring I also hear Theory of Poker is decent.. but haven't read it yet. I saw it in the book store but it looked like a lot of mathematical mumbo jumbo and sample hands.. which really don't help me much.

    O
  26. #26
    Question for those avid readers out there:

    Which slansky book is best?

    And would it be better to read that, or Professional No Limit Hold'em instead if a choice betweent the two had to be made?
  27. #27
    dev's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,624
    Location
    swonging and swonging
    Quote Originally Posted by Micro2Macro
    Question for those avid readers out there:

    Which slansky book is best?

    And would it be better to read that, or Professional No Limit Hold'em instead if a choice betweent the two had to be made?
    Let me reiterate this thread for you:
    ToP, ToP, ToP, some other books, ToP, ToP, ToP.
    Check out my self-deprecation here!
  28. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by Outlaw
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    I guess you're playing NL

    Theory of Poker is a must-read, no matter what game you play. After that you'd be better off using most poker books as kindling.
    I am a student of this school of thought as well.

    It took me a year to unlearn a lot of the crap I learned in the HoH series. They are great for turning a beginner into a marginally losing player, but sngs/tournies are full of people treating HoH like the bible and handing the good players chip after chip after chip after.. you get the idea. For tournies I think Poker Tournament Formula is the best thing out there.

    I have read all of the HOH books. Excellent books I must say but definitely not intended for ring games. That is why Harrington came out with HoCG (Harrington on Cash Games) which I just picked up yesterday. I'm only on the 2nd chapter but it seems great so far. The style is set up the same as his tourny books. He goes over a concept then gives a few real life examples. If you are thinking of getting this book I recommend you read the HOH series first because many of his ideas are based off that series. He compares it to HOH and then shows you how his cash game differs. Harrington is a great player and I think ALL of his books are a must read.
    ________________________________


    Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.
  29. #29
    Quote Originally Posted by HeAVyB101
    Quote Originally Posted by Outlaw
    Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
    I guess you're playing NL

    Theory of Poker is a must-read, no matter what game you play. After that you'd be better off using most poker books as kindling.
    I am a student of this school of thought as well.

    It took me a year to unlearn a lot of the crap I learned in the HoH series. They are great for turning a beginner into a marginally losing player, but sngs/tournies are full of people treating HoH like the bible and handing the good players chip after chip after chip after.. you get the idea. For tournies I think Poker Tournament Formula is the best thing out there.

    I have read all of the HOH books. Excellent books I must say but definitely not intended for ring games. That is why Harrington came out with HoCG (Harrington on Cash Games) which I just picked up yesterday. I'm only on the 2nd chapter but it seems great so far. The style is set up the same as his tourny books. He goes over a concept then gives a few real life examples. If you are thinking of getting this book I recommend you read the HOH series first because many of his ideas are based off that series. He compares it to HOH and then shows you how his cash game differs. Harrington is a great player and I think ALL of his books are a must read.
    I was going to purchase that book but I saw a few negative reviews on it. I haven't read HOH though. Please let me know what you think of HoCG. I'm in the process of reading Theory of Poker.
    OP: Beginner to Master

    If I bet as a bluff, I should be thinking "am I getting better hands to fold? Is it likely that he will fold x% of the time to a y sized bet to make it +EV?". If I bet for value, I should be thinking "am I getting worst hands to call? Am I ahead of enough of his range that this is a good value bet?".
  30. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by dev
    Quote Originally Posted by Micro2Macro
    Question for those avid readers out there:

    Which slansky book is best?

    And would it be better to read that, or Professional No Limit Hold'em instead if a choice betweent the two had to be made?
    Let me reiterate this thread for you:
    ToP, ToP, ToP, some other books, ToP, ToP, ToP.
    lol so in other words:

    ToP > all other poker books ever written. Correct?
  31. #31
    Meh, Theory of Poker IS a great book and should be required reading for all poker players, but eventually we have to branch out to the specifics of the game or games we like whether it's cash, tournaments or no limit, limit, Omaha, stud, or whatever. There's also branches of psychology and mindset, so there will never be one book to end all other books. But, most agree Theory of Poker is the best place to start.
    - Jason

  32. #32
    Anyone find Harrington on Cash Games to be a must read?
    OP: Beginner to Master

    If I bet as a bluff, I should be thinking "am I getting better hands to fold? Is it likely that he will fold x% of the time to a y sized bet to make it +EV?". If I bet for value, I should be thinking "am I getting worst hands to call? Am I ahead of enough of his range that this is a good value bet?".
  33. #33
    Improve Your Poker, written by Nick Christenson. I flick through it whenever I have a chance. For I can calm down and think through my last round and check which part went wrong. I do IMPROVE.
  34. #34
    Wow, so many wonderful poker books! I will pick some for sharpening my poker skills.
  35. #35
    Quote Originally Posted by lucilla118
    Wow, so many wonderful poker books! I will pick some for sharpening my poker skills.
    i can post
  36. #36
    Quote Originally Posted by Micro2Macro
    Quote Originally Posted by lucilla118
    Wow, so many wonderful poker books! I will pick some for sharpening my poker skills.
    i can post
    NO WAY! ME TOO!
    OP: Beginner to Master

    If I bet as a bluff, I should be thinking "am I getting better hands to fold? Is it likely that he will fold x% of the time to a y sized bet to make it +EV?". If I bet for value, I should be thinking "am I getting worst hands to call? Am I ahead of enough of his range that this is a good value bet?".
  37. #37
    finished chapter 3 today xpaand ^_^ yourself?
  38. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by lucilla118
    Wow, so many wonderful poker books! I will pick some for sharpening my poker skills.
    Harrington on Freerolls is soon to be released . Its gonna be a cracker and well worth looking out for.
  39. #39
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Keith_MM
    Quote Originally Posted by lucilla118
    Wow, so many wonderful poker books! I will pick some for sharpening my poker skills.
    Harrington on Freerolls is soon to be released . Its gonna be a cracker and well worth looking out for.
    lol'd
  40. #40
    I loved the HOH series so I don't see why HoCG should be any worse. It's set up the exact same as the HOH series with examples and what not. So far the book is good but i haven't read deep into the book so I can't give any solid feedback. I will definitely post my oppinion on the forum once I finish it.
    ________________________________


    Dumb man climb tree to get cherry, wise man spread limbs.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •