|
|
 Originally Posted by Imthenewfish
cliffs: Do you go batshit insane with adjustments and just rely on readjusting to how your opponents adjust, or do you gradually adjust and just focus on getting some eevees out of it without your opponent adjusting?
I basically believe that there exists an optimal amount of adjustment for each and every opponent, i.e. an exploitation 'sweet spot' that enables us to get the maximum expectation out of them at a given point in time. So, to liken this to the two scenarios you mentioned 1) adjusting drastically, hoping to exploit the opponent maximally and in short order, and 2) adjusting more gradually, the trade off, it seems to me, is as follows:
The first method may allow us to make the maximum amount in the short term, however we are A: more likely to be adjusted against, and B: more likely to get the adjustment wrong.
In the second case, we are less likely to be immediately adjusted against, and less likely to make an overly erroneous adjustment, however we may give up some value in the short term.
Thoughts?
|
Reply With Quote