Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

openraised to 39bb pf by mistake

Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Default openraised to 39bb pf by mistake

    no point to this point. im just pissed off.
    playing 5 handed $200nl. i open raise in CO with 93s to $77. btn thinks and then moves allin. SB and BB fold. i also fold. another $130 to call.

    im so annoyed. i misclicked!!!!!!!

    it's never happened to me before. why did somone have to wake up with a monster hand!!!!!!!!!!
    http://pokerlife.wordpress.com/
    18 years old. short-handed $600NL.
  2. #2
    You probably should have called for reputation's sake.
  3. #3
    What makes you think they did?

    Fairly blatant misclick, villain knows this and knows youll probably fold so pushes a very wide range.
  4. #4
    it's suited! I think I would have cried and called, lol
    Quote Originally Posted by Fnord View Post
    Why poker fucks with our heads: it's the master that beats you for bringing in the paper, then gives you a milkbone for peeing on the carpet.

    blog: http://donkeybrainspoker.com/


    Watch me stream $200 hyper HU and $100 Spins on Twitch!
  5. #5
    Call and spike two threes.

    Poker is easy!
  6. #6
    i thought that he knew that it was a misclick and therefore pushed but i just cant call in that spot.

    there are players still left to act behind him. so if they had a good hand or i had a good hand he would be in trouble.

    also, i'm only getting about 2.6 to 1 odds. so i need a 28% chance of winning to call. i think he must had an above average hand at worst. if he was bluffing then i would be between a 60-40 and a 65-35 dog. but i think that most of his range is premimum hands.

    against 33-88. im a 70-30 dog and against TT+ i'm miles behind.

    should i really have called?
    http://pokerlife.wordpress.com/
    18 years old. short-handed $600NL.
  7. #7
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,043
    Location
    Drinking your milkshake.
    equity win tie pots won pots tied
    Hand 0: 28.015% 27.72% 00.30% 165177060 1761720.00 { 93s }
    Hand 1: 71.985% 71.69% 00.30% 427181292 1761720.00 { 88+, AJs+, AJo+ }

    That's kinda a breakeven range. Not sure whether I would call or not. I think I would against a thinking or aggro player, not against a nit though, as they would have a much tighter range here.
  8. #8
    its a funny but tough spot. calling would be HUGE for your rep
    Jman: every time the action is to you, it's an opportunity for you to make the perfect play.
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Mac
    equity win tie pots won pots tied
    Hand 0: 28.015% 27.72% 00.30% 165177060 1761720.00 { 93s }
    Hand 1: 71.985% 71.69% 00.30% 427181292 1761720.00 { 88+, AJs+, AJo+ }

    That's kinda a breakeven range. Not sure whether I would call or not. I think I would against a thinking or aggro player, not against a nit though, as they would have a much tighter range here.
    I think his range his tighter than this. If I was in his situation and knew that it was a misclick - I would not play AJ, 88, 99 or AQ. i would play AK and TT+.
    Even if it is a misclick - it is unlikely that i have a hand as bad as 93s.
    I'm not that loose. And there is still the possibility that I have a mega hand or 2 of the players behind me have a mega hand.

    And if it is so likely that a player behind you will push a bad man to the fake click. Then I think the best way to play AA is to raise to $77 instead of $7.
    Only try it once with a group of players. But if what you say is true then i think it's probably the most profitable way to play them.

    BTW, sbrugby actually did do the fake misclick against Phil Ivey twice. Both on purpose.
    Here's a link:
    http://www.pocketfives.com/9321167B-...73535B0E1.aspx
    http://pokerlife.wordpress.com/
    18 years old. short-handed $600NL.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •