NL10 TPMK vs Unknown Passive

Villian is unknown i has no stats at NL10

$0.05/$0.1 No Limit Holdem
PokerStars
6 players
Converted at weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG F.Evgeniy ($5.35)
UTG 1 100%tukker ($10.00)
CO Hero ($10.50)
BTN Skjalm_71 ($25.05)
SB CMPokerace ($7.40)
BB hansje8 ($22.90)

Pre-flop: ($0.15, 6 players) Hero is CO
F.Evgeniy calls $0.10, 1 fold, Hero raises to $0.50, 2 folds, hansje8 calls $0.40, F.Evgeniy calls $0.40

Flop: ($1.55, 3 players)
hansje8 checks, F.Evgeniy checks, Hero bets $0.90, hansje8 folds, F.Evgeniy calls $0.90

Turn: ($3.35, 2 players)
F.Evgeniy bets $0.50, Hero raises to $2.90, F.Evgeniy calls $2.40

River: ($9.15, 2 players)
F.Evgeniy bets $0.90, Hero raises to $1.80, F.Evgeniy goes all-in $0.15

[Results Hidden]

Post what you think then ill post what i think.

I think the flop bet needs to be bigger (although it'd be very good on a K64r flop) and you should have just shoved the turn with his stack-size.

Originally Posted by bigspenda73

I think the flop bet needs to be bigger (although it'd be very good on a K64r flop) and you should have just shoved the turn with his stack-size.

Yep that is what i was thinking, what do you think villian is showing up with here most of the time?

Edited:
One question result orientated

hands we beat and hands that beat us

I couldn't give you a great range, on the flop his range is a lot of draws and mediocre 1-pair hands. On the turn it goes much more towards draws.

could this be typical of someone hitting the set with either pocket 4's or 2's?.It puzzles me why the villain bet .90 on the river ...why didn't he just go all in ? Unless that was the last of his bankroll.