One thing I love about Performance Poker is that it is downright untestable.

1. You have to find a site where people are passive enough to let you limp in with your premium hands... then fold to c-bets on cue... yet still blow off their stacks once the rock hits his hand. Who plays like this?

For example, AOK is dealt 22 on the big blind. He limps in to a flop of 2 4 7. He wants to get action here, but unless there's a high pocket pair (who would have raised more than 5xBB preflop abyway) or a straight draw, he won't get any.


2. You can go to P@c*f*c Poker if you want want to see the worst rake table on the net. They even take a cut from uncalled bets!

Fortune Poker doesn't mean diddley, beacuse it is on Boss Network. They're cancelling all US acounts. PokerChamps, Ladbrokes, Everest, Svenska Spiel and WPT Online are all giant fishbowls too -- and they all refuse US accounts.

The players on these sites are so bad that ANY tight strategy can work. Just grab a starting hand chart and grind away.

I submit that the issue is NOT the average pot size on Party. The problem is that the site is loaded with loose agressive recreational players donating to tight agressive multitablers. The 19 hander will get run over by both sides of the battle.

The nanolimits at Stars are loaded with people like beginners who are trying to improve, so they will be playing to carefully to make the sorts of blunders that AOK's style needs to work.