|
If you think in simple terms of everyone gets the same amount of hands, over a long term, let's say 100,000 hands, everybody gets the same amount of hands, same amount of AA, KK, 72offsuit. If you play every hand, and everyone at the table played every hand, you would basically break even, except the house would win by taking rake. By playing less hands, you are starting with only the hands that will win consistantly over a long period of time, and while everyone battles over that same amount of time to breajk even, you will only play in the potential winning hands.
The perfect play would consist of only playing AA and starting with the best hand. The problem stems from staying ahead of the blinds, antes and the times that AA does lose, so by adding just enough good hands, and only long term winning hands, we play winning poker.
|