Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

My 2/3 of the pot estimate

Results 1 to 29 of 29
  1. #1

    Default My 2/3 of the pot estimate

    Ive been estimating my 2/3 of the pot and am wondering if its a bad way to estimate.


    Here is how I estimate 2/3
    Say Pot = $3 (even though its obviously $2)

    I multiply by 7 and move the decimal over, 3*7= 21

    Gives me $2.1 , just over 2/3 .

    ---------------------------------

    say Pot=$1.76, bit trickier in the head

    1*7=7 , ($0.70 )
    7*7=49 (call it $.50)

    2/3 is $1.30 , which is nearer 3/4 .
    --------------------------------------

    Does any one use a more accurate 2/3 estimation method ?
  2. #2
    Or you could just create a 67% of pot bet button depending on where you play.
  3. #3
    I don't understand, why can't you just divide by 3 and multiply by 2?
  4. #4
    lol, just multiply by 66 and move the decimal over two places. j/k

    i always pick the closest multiple of 3 close to the number and then take 2/3 of that easy number. for example, 2/3 of 1.47 is very close to 2/3 of 1.5 which is 1 obv.

    or, kinda like what stargrinder said, you can use tableninja. i believe it has four preset bet-some-fixed-%-of-pot settings and they work for raises too.
  5. #5
    You can't quickly estimate 66% of a given number? Here, let me try...

    345... 230
    8746... 5400ish
    123456789... 70000000ish

    that took 30 seconds to do all three
  6. #6
    8746 is actually 5830.667
    123456789 is actually 82304526

    So I'm crap at that too. But I'm stoned, that's my excuse.
  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    1,441
    Location
    IRC, Come join me!
    why don't u just bet 1/2 the pot, easier to estimate
    http://www.flopturnriver.com/pokerfo...-a-153854.html

    Join IRC. Now.

    <Cobra> Nobody folds an A BvB, that's absurd
  8. #8
    Uh, most computer have this thing called a calculator

    or use Excel to calculate it on the fly.
    "Just cause I'm from the South don't mean I ain't got no book learnin'"

    Quote Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla View Post
    ...we've all learned long ago how to share the truth without actually having the truth.
  9. #9
    Sometime I can get close using my method at 2Nl . my inaccuracies are tiny at these stakes,but bigger stakes would men larger errors.

    I wondered if anyone had a better method than im using.

    Im trying the methods suggested ^^^^^ divide by 3 , multiply by 2.

    The pot became $5.55 , I got brain freeze. couldn't divide by 3 at the table.and rounding it to $5.40 gave me $3.60 , still too small
  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Sasquach991 View Post
    Uh, most computer have this thing called a calculator

    or use Excel to calculate it on the fly.
    lol

    I do have it on excel , to check my estimates.( 2/3 and 3/4 ). just wanted a quicker way in my head.
  11. #11
    Razvan729's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,135
    Location
    Bucuresti, Romania
    if you play in pokerstars, go in lobby to options, choose bet slider and there you can set 3buttons with a specific procent of pot you wanna bet/raise post flop. like this no need to do math , just press button and there you go
  12. #12
    Quote Originally Posted by Razvan729 View Post
    if you play in pokerstars, go in lobby to options, choose bet slider and there you can set 3buttons with a specific procent of pot you wanna bet/raise post flop. like this no need to do math , just press button and there you go
    Cheers, I knew not , that this feature was there.
  13. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by Viscaro View Post
    I don't understand, why can't you just divide by 3 and multiply by 2?
    this, it doesnt have to be perfectly accurate
  14. #14
    spoonitnow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    14,219
    Location
    North Carolina
    wat
  15. #15
    why worry about this? do you think this is what separates elite poker players from the turbo elite?
  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by celtic123 View Post
    Sometime I can get close using my method at 2Nl . my inaccuracies are tiny at these stakes,but bigger stakes would men larger errors.

    I wondered if anyone had a better method than im using.

    Im trying the methods suggested ^^^^^ divide by 3 , multiply by 2.

    The pot became $5.55 , I got brain freeze. couldn't divide by 3 at the table.and rounding it to $5.40 gave me $3.60 , still too small
    Why not round up to an easy number?

    $5.55 becomes $6---- 2/3= $4.

    Why does your bet HAVE to be 2/3rds all the time? If you are betting this amount only with certain hands then observant players will read you like a book.
  17. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    8,697
    Location
    soaking up ethanol, moving on up
    Quote Originally Posted by spoonitnow View Post
    wat
    .
  18. #18
    REALLY?
    "You start the game with a full pot o’ luck and an empty pot o’ experience...
    The object is to fill the pot of experience before you empty the pot of luck."

    Quote Originally Posted by XxStacksxX View Post
    Do you have testicles? If so, learn to bet like it
  19. #19
    it's really important to bet exactly 2/3 pot else the mayor of poker will castrate your firstborn or something
  20. #20
    You could divide the pot by half (50%), then half again (25%), add the second half to the fist half (75%), then reduce it by half of the 25% (12.5%), then add on half of the 12.5% (6.25%) and we're pretty close.

    Alternatively, you could divide the pot by three, then multiply the result by two, but I think that will take longer.
  21. #21
    You could break up 66% into several groups of percentages. 50% plus 10% plus 5% plus 1% ≈ 2/3 pot.

    1/2 pot + 1/10 pot

    plus half of (1/10 pot)

    plus 1/100 pot (optional)

    Those are all fractions that should be easy to do in your head. Obviously the 1/100 pot is pretty much a waste of time, since you're already at 65%.
  22. #22
    lol i can't believe this thread has gotten so many responses
  23. #23
    !Luck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    1,876
    Location
    Under a bridge
    You are focusing on the wrong leak.
  24. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    You could divide the pot by half (50%), then half again (25%), add the second half to the fist half (75%), then reduce it by half of the 25% (12.5%), then add on half of the 12.5% (6.25%) and we're pretty close.
    winner
  25. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by couriermike View Post
    winner
    What, you don't like "A half and a tenth, and half of a tenth"? LMAO.
  26. #26
    Shotglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    1,755
    Location
    feelin' allright
    Quote Originally Posted by OngBonga View Post
    You could divide the pot by half (50%), then half again (25%), add the second half to the fist half (75%), then reduce it by half of the 25% (12.5%), then add on half of the 12.5% (6.25%) and we're pretty close.

    Alternatively, you could divide the pot by three, then multiply the result by two, but I think that will take longer.

    Quote Originally Posted by givememyleg View Post
    i'll never understand how anyone can go through life being sober.
  27. #27
    Another option is to multiply the pot by 3735854 and divide the result by 5603781.
  28. #28
    Quote Originally Posted by celtic123 View Post
    I multiply by 7 and move the decimal over, 3*7= 21
    Ok, I'll stop being a dick for a mintue and comment on this seriously. Personally, I can divide a number by three much quicker than I can multiply the same number by seven. Once we have a third, it's very easy to double that number, and not only have we taken less time, but we're accurate too.

    b = 2*(p/3) where p is pot and b is bet. Simple.
    Last edited by OngBonga; 02-10-2011 at 10:59 AM.
  29. #29
    Oh, and your method is ok to be fair, it will always give you 70% of the pot, since what you are doing when you move the decimal place over is dividing by ten, so your formula would look like this...

    b = 7p/10

    If p=100, then b = 70, or 70%.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •