|
Fnord is absolutely right, so I'm going to move the discussion forward.
1. You are up against 3 short stacks, and they all 3 have 17xBB in their stacks, exactly the amount of the pot.
2. You are up against 2 short stacks (~20xBB) and one tall stack, and you and him each have 100xBB in your stacks.
3. All 4 players at the table have 96xBB in their stack on the flop.
4. All 4 players have 40xBB in stack.
Now, how do you proceed in each situation?
For me, I push in 1, bet 24xBB in 2, and in 3 I bet 17xBB for information. No matter what the case is, I'm betting about the pot, but for different reasons.
Situation 4, by far the most common, is by far the toughest situation. By playing too aggressively, you run the risk of giving the table implied odds on you, making the A or even a K a miracle card for the "smart slowplayer" with, perhaps, a set. However, by playing meekly, you are inviting 3 other players to take a cheap card on you and make 4th street even tougher. If you do get check-raised on the flop after a pot sized bet, you've only got 23xBB left with a 70ishxBB pot, giving you the right price to only chase against weak 2 pair (A 6, not A 10). Ultimately, situation 4 is confusing and is why I don't play NL holdem...it just takes instinct and guts to know what's right in this situation.
|