|
misapplying clarkmeister theorem?
villain is like 50/0 over 10 hands and i have nothing but hud reads on him.
the turn bet didn't feel right in a 3-way pot, and the only reason i made the river bet was because of the clarkmeister theorem (if you are first to act HU on a 4-flushed board, you should bet it). my ranges basically had him on hands he's calling with here. thoughts on this hand and the theorem as a whole?
i'm assuming the short answer is that ranges trump all
Full Tilt Pot-Limit Hold'em, $0.10 BB (6 handed) - Full-Tilt Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com
Hero (UTG) ($11.29)
MP ($3.62)
CO ($7.70)
Button ($4.27)
SB ($11.10)
BB ($9.11)
Preflop: Hero is UTG with ,
Hero bets $0.35, MP calls $0.35, 3 folds, BB calls $0.25
Flop: ($1.10) , , (3 players)
BB checks, Hero checks, MP checks
Turn: ($1.10) (3 players)
BB checks, Hero bets $0.80, MP calls $0.80, 1 fold
River: ($2.70) (2 players)
Hero bets $2.70 (this put villain all in so i just decided to bet the max)
|