Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

Low stack/all-in strategy

Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Default Low stack/all-in strategy

    Hi.

    I've heard that playing with minimum buy-in and push all-in as often as possible could be a good strategy. What do you guys think?

    Maybe someone could post a strategy of this type of play. When to go all in, which hands etc etc.
  2. #2
    Ragnar4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,184
    Location
    Billings, Montana
    in b4 lock
    The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes
  3. #3
    This is a pro strat.
    Quote Originally Posted by Carroters
    Take it Doyle, take it!
  4. #4

    Default Re: Low stack/all-in strategy

    Quote Originally Posted by NaXus
    Hi.

    I've heard that playing with minimum buy-in and push all-in as often as possible could be a good strategy. What do you guys think?

    Maybe someone could post a strategy of this type of play. When to go all in, which hands etc etc.
    It only works when you have 72 offsuit.
  5. #5

    Default Re: Low stack/all-in strategy

    Quote Originally Posted by LawDude
    Quote Originally Posted by NaXus
    Hi.

    I've heard that playing with minimum buy-in and push all-in as often as possible could be a good strategy. What do you guys think?

    Maybe someone could post a strategy of this type of play. When to go all in, which hands etc etc.
    It only works when you have 72 offsuit.
    Very funny
  6. #6

    Default Re: Low stack/all-in strategy

    Quote Originally Posted by NaXus
    Hi.

    I've heard that playing with minimum buy-in and push all-in as often as possible could be a good strategy. What do you guys think?

    Maybe someone could post a strategy of this type of play. When to go all in, which hands etc etc.
    Very funny
  7. #7
    OK, if you want a slightly serious answer, playing short-stacked means that you won't be able to maximize value with your big hands, and you won't be able to push players out of hands when you need to thin the herd or want to take down the pot.

    On the other hand, playing short-stacked decreases your opponents' implied odds and may get them to fold some drawing hands that they might otherwise play against you.

    I happen to much prefer playing with a deep stack. But if you play good fundamental poker, at least at the microstakes it is probably possible to win using either approach. As you go up in stakes and skill level, the importance of aggression and the need to maximize the value of your big hands will make it very difficult for you to succeed with a small chip stack.
  8. #8
    Stacks's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    4,015
    Location
    Im opedipus bitch, the original balla.
    OP, there are numerous threads regarding this subject. Search the forum to see what you can find about half-stack strategy. There is even an article written by 'Fnord' regarding short-stack play.

    {locked by Stax}

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •