Logic and maths aren't exactly the same or we probably wouldnt bother to have 2 words for them. Mathematics is based on logic, and logic can be considered to be a branch of mathematics. When you play poker you don't explicitly calculate the numbers because it would take too long. Instead of saying there is a 90% chance of this guy having a hand this time you say this guy probably has a hand because he is raising and he is passive.

One thing is for sure. If you work out a logical mathematical expression for EV and then chose the option which doesn't maximise it then you are behaving illogically and irrationally and you are costing yourself money.

In your example if we think we are up against a favorable range then we call (provided we are bankrolled enough to be playing in the game in the first place). If we put him on too tight a range then we fold. This is regardless of stack size although stack size can influence the range we put him on. There are 2 factors why we should usually be less inclined to call when the stacks are larger. They are both logical and mathematical.

1) As the stacks increase, there is proportionally less dead money. If we have 22 and there is a gazillion dollars in the pot and we have to call 1 more then we call and hope to suck out. Better odds = looser calling range for obvious reasons.

2) As the stacks increase most rational villains will push allin with a tighter range. With a gazillion dollars in the pot and $1 effective stacks he would be correct to push with any 2 in the hope you misclick fold. With $1 in the pot and a gazzillion dollar stacks even the most retarded of villains isnt going to be overbet bluffing very often. Made hands are affected in the same way. Most villains will push allin with QT here for half pot and want a call. Most of them will be far less inclined to overbet push with a few times the size of the pot behind.

If you happen to find someone who does not adjust to stack sizes, and can be value pushing Qx as well as maybe overbet bluffing with 23o then you call here every time with QJ for as many times the size of the pot as you have infront of you. The logic and the maths always agree.