Thanks for the replies. My normal line is to fold without a thought, but I sometimes vary my play if I feel a table is particularly weak, or my image allows it. I'll be happy to admit that this limp was more on instinct then based on a considered evaluation of whether it would be a +EV move. I was only playing on one table at the time and was paying a lot of attention to how the other players played and felt at this time that I would able to tell if I ended up way behind on the flop and be able to get out of a hand I wasn't particularly married to in the case of a missed flop.

I know the dangers of playing one table - it's boring and very easy to end up playing more hands than is wise. One of the first thing I started doing when I started playing was play more than one table at a time to distract me and keep from making stupid plays out of boredom. Recently I've started occasionally doing some one-table sessions where I try to pay attention to and take notes on everything and have good time to make sure I think through what's happening. If I do anywhere near the amount of things I should do in every hand there is no time to be bored even on just one table.

When I made the post-raise call I was very aware I would have position for the rest of the hand, which would allow me to get out if I missed and someone decided to lead into the hand - or bet/raise in position.

I'd be interested to hear if my predictions on villain's range at the time of his post-flop bet are reasonable. It happened to be correct, but that could have been me having a wrong thought process and him making a poor play. I think we can agree that he shouldn't have played Tc6c pre-flop the way he did - I'm thinking about the expectations I expressed regarding betting, which he happened to match.