|  | 
			
			
			
					
					
						
					
			
				
					
						
	I'm confused here, why is the K8o+ and KTs+ not K8s+ and KTo+?
		
			
			
				
					  Originally Posted by EasyPoker   Board: Kh 3d 8s 
Dead:  
    equity      win     tie           pots won     pots tied     
Hand 0:     53.825%      47.85%     05.98%             248694         31059.00   { KQo } 
Hand 1:     46.175%      40.20%     05.98%             208938         31059.00   { KK +, TT , AKs, KTs+, AKo, K8o+, K3o }
 
I'm  calling.
 
Please tell  me if this is wrong. I don't necessarily like the range of hands, but regardless, that doesn't make sense to me.  also, your pokerstove should have the turn on there as well, as this is where we are making our decision, yours just confirmed our flop call, so given your ranges (I'll just use the same ones here..)
 
 Board: Kh 3d 8s Tc
 Dead:
 
 equity     win     tie           pots won     pots tied
 Hand 0:     35.901%      30.35%     05.56%                721           132.00   { KcQh }
 Hand 1:     64.099%      58.54%     05.56%               1391           132.00   { KK+, TT, AKs, KTs+, AKo, K8o+, K3o }
 
 if this is his range, I am folding FTW, unless I have a good read.
 However, I also feel the range is either much wider, or much narrower than this.  That really depends on his playing style... though he can't be making much money pot/shove on flop/turn with made hands overall, if he does this with monsters.  So I would guess** a wider range than this, though I am not personally shipping here though that is my strategy.
 
 (((EDIT:: Also, you'll note I put the suits of the cards in pokerstove, though this isn't super significant it does change the numbers over having simply KQo, at least until the turn comes.  it changes equity from 53.825% to 53.285%, this is because his KcQh only covers one of the suits on the board, so since there is a heart on the board, this removes outs for one double flush draw.  On average generic KQo is going to cover more than one suit on this board, maybe something like 1.3.  This is relatively insignificant, and won't make a difference in our decision here, but there are situations where it might make more of a difference, ie. XYs rather than XhYh.  Just thought I would mention that for future reference, as it essentially gives the calculations more (and more accurate) information.)))
 |