Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

JJ bb mono flop

Results 1 to 47 of 47

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Roid_Rage View Post
    Idk, im a nit on monotone boards w/o the draw OOP. I prefer a donk here since he's fairly nitty and will fold anything that doesn't fit this flop well.
    This might sound crazy, but I don't see being OOP against a nit as being that bad. He has to take advantage of that position for us to get exploited, and since I don't really see him making a ton of multi-street bluffs, A) we're not going to often get folded off the best hand because he's not going to bluff after we call the flop and B) we're not going to often be putting more money in with the worst of it because we won't be bluff catching given that villain doesn't bluff.

    Obviously all of this is based on the premise that he's not going to be barreling turns light, which I might be wrong about being a safe assumption.
  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by surviva316 View Post
    This might sound crazy, but I don't see being OOP against a nit as being that bad. He has to take advantage of that position for us to get exploited, and since I don't really see him making a ton of multi-street bluffs, A) we're not going to often get folded off the best hand because he's not going to bluff after we call the flop and B) we're not going to often be putting more money in with the worst of it because we won't be bluff catching given that villain doesn't bluff.

    Obviously all of this is based on the premise that he's not going to be barreling turns light, which I might be wrong about being a safe assumption.
    13/8 after 24. I don't think we have enough data to say he's that tight or nitty.
    This is not my signature. I just write this at the bottom of every post.
  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by gingerwizard View Post
    13/8 after 24. I don't think we have enough data to say he's that tight or nitty.
    In the context of the BC, I should probably be less liberal in using this word. Also, since I've been away from the game for almost a year, I probably should be less liberal in making assumptions about how these stakes play.

    BUT, as confirmed by my short time back at 4nl 6m (LOL!), it does still seem to be the case that micro regs are the botty, not-too-balanced type of players. They don't seem to 3b light or go for multi-street bluffs or float or abuse the button or any of that. As such, I would assume that the vast majority of players running 13/8 with a 20% ATS over their first 24 hands aren't going to be barreling light a "scary" board.

    It's kind of a semantics things because everyone's so botty at micros that the word nit almost means something different in this context.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •