|
|
 Originally Posted by iopq
Originally Posted by tunah
Some bounds, assuming $100 behind before the $10 bet:
what if we're $1000000 deep? nobody said our stack size
Yep, the bounds are going to vary with the effective depth, that was just an example. Sufficiently deep, and that strategy won't give you an upper bound. (If you know something about opponent's tendencies, you can get a better bound).
Hmm, I'm trying to think of a case where river play would be so optimal/pessimal that the bounds are relevant. Could be true if your opponent (or yourself) is a complete station, or possibly if effective stacks on the river are tiny. If this causes you to play badly you can shove over on the turn, but if (for example) you have the NFD, and there is so little behind that he can't fold his made hand on the river, then you can flat call with a little less equity because you'll win a slightly bigger pot than you'll lose. I guess this is just a case where the implied odds are precisely calculable.
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
everything after this line describes the types of things that affect implied odds (one or more of which you described incorrectly)
You'll tell me at the end, right? 
Originally Posted by spoonitnow
Originally Posted by iopq
what if we're $1000000 deep? nobody said our stack size
This is key to a complete answer.
So the case that's missing is something that happens very deep? I'm trying to think of something that isn't just another way of saying 'implied odds'.
Maybe with a narrow enough hand range for opponent, scare cards are as good as outs?
|
Reply With Quote