|
 Originally Posted by bigspenda73
I wonder when Spoon thinks of these things, must be tough to find the time in between taking pictures of racist church signs and banging 14yr. old redheads.
I asked in IRC, "What would you like the next quiz to be about?" Someone replied, "Pot odds."
 Originally Posted by killerkebab
Since you call it pot odds edition, I'll just say equity needed is:
(total bets we're calling)/(total bets we're calling + pot before we call the last bet)
I know what you're trying to say here, but you're a little off. The part in the bold is the reason you're a little off.
 Originally Posted by tunah
Correct for the case that the $10 puts us all-in. That leaves some other cases, though.
 Originally Posted by tunah
Another case is when implied odds are going to be the deciding factor, and everything after this line describes the types of things that affect implied odds (one or more of which you described incorrectly). But there's a third case which you and killerkebab have barely touched on but haven't described in detail.
 Originally Posted by tunah
0% suffices in some cases
This is an example of the fourth case I thought of. For what it's worth, I only came up with 4 cases.
 Originally Posted by tunah
80% equity always suffices: Assuming you never win anything on the river and he takes your stack whenever he beats you (i.e. you call 100% on the river), you need (1-e)*(-100) + e*25 > 0.
You could argue this is an example of a 5th case that isn't always available.
 Originally Posted by iopq
what if we're $1000000 deep? nobody said our stack size
This is key to a complete answer.
|