|
|
 Originally Posted by amir is cool
Very good guess, but in hold'em it doesn't change enough for this particular scenario for it to be forced -EV.
Originally Posted by tpb221
Doing some quick math the best I can see it to be is a even EV. And thats putting him on ATC.
Why would you ever put him on any two cards? If in a 100bb 6-max game a 22/18 with a 38% attempt to steal open raises from the button, do you assume he has any two cards there also?
Originally Posted by XxStacksxX
We need 48.33% equity to make a call profitable. So yeah, a call can be +EV. It can also be -EV.
Just because I like busting your nuts, this isn't entirely true either because of the rake. Bam.
Originally Posted by tunah and others
This is correct. When folded to, a significant portion of people would shove something like K5s or J7s, but they would be much less likely to shove something like QQ+. A portion of people wouldn't even shove 22, instead opting to open limp with small pocket pairs.
The point of this example is that hand-reading isn't as simple as reading numbers off of a chart, and even if you have something like a HUD then you should still keep notes about how players play specific hands preflop.
|
Reply With Quote