|
 Originally Posted by Crotalusatrox
Thats making some more sense. How do you calculate implied odds though? I see people saying "I called cause i was 2:1" or something like that. How do you get from "my implied odds are better than my pot odds" to "My implied odds are better, and they are better by X:1"?
Pot odds are defined(if there's nobody left to act). Implied odds are obviously trickier to figure. Depends on lots of variables.
 Originally Posted by Crotalusatrox
Oh and just to make sure I am getting this right. Say I am at a 9 man table on the button with pocket deuces. Someone early raises 5xbb(probable pockets JJ or better, or AK, AQ?) say he gets one caller before me. My pot odds are crap, but my implied odds say that if I hit a set on the flop I stand a good shot of cleaning out both players ahead of me? So I should call, but if I miss my set get out unless I can stay in for free?
You're probably only going to clean out one guy(if you're lucky). I generally like to get in cheap to hit a low/mid set, but you can call a larger bet if you think you can de-stack him AND both of your stacks are deep enough. You're normally folding your ducks to any flop bet and moreso if there is >2 in the pot.
 Originally Posted by Crotalusatrox
Just for sake of argument in that scenario I just gave, how would you play it post- flop if it hit you but you are prett certain it cleanly missed both opps, say 2s 6c 9d? How would you play it if it hit you but they might have got a piece of it, with say a 2s 6c qd?
Generally slow-playing a set on an uncoordinated board is the standard move with some bets occasionally to mix it up. The more coordinated or players are in the pot, the more you want to bet your set vs. checking. Second scenario isn't much different. If they have AQ/KQ you're way ahead. If they flopped trip queens you're losing your stack anyway.
|