Should I play 6max or full ring, I do $2 NL at pokerstars.
01-23-2011 08:17 PM
#1
| |
![]() ![]()
|
|
01-23-2011 08:31 PM
#2
| |
![]() ![]()
|
FR has the easiest learning curve imo. |
01-23-2011 08:45 PM
#3
| |
Either is fine. Personally, I found FR to be easier to learn. Take your time. Read http://www.flopturnriver.com/pokerfo...ers-93053.html. Ask any questions you like. | |
01-23-2011 09:23 PM
#4
| |
same shit but fr has better rb on stars | |
| |
01-23-2011 09:39 PM
#5
| |
play play money until u have a few hundred million, then play 50nl | |
| |
01-24-2011 09:34 AM
#6
| |
| |
01-24-2011 09:57 AM
#7
| |
Strangely, when it comes to cash rooms, I'm much better at FR than 6max, but when it comes to tourneys, my 6max game is very good. I think it's because I'm a lot more loose-aggressive in a 6max tourney, I play too tight in 6max cash games. I wouldn't suggest taking a loose-aggressive style to 6max cash rooms, so I'd suggest FR, but it depends on your game I suppose. FR is good for a tight-aggressive style, which is pretty much the only way to successfully play the micros. 6max $2nl I find is for the maniacs who just want to play every hand, I can't be doing with that. | |
| |