Select Page
Poker Forum
Over 1,292,000 Posts!
Poker ForumBeginners Circle

I'm having a problem with the converter

Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1

    Default I'm having a problem with the converter

    example here is a hh one copy in a raw format and the other copy converted

    Hand #49036566-40401 at Uppordorf (No Limit Hold'em)
    Started at 10/Jan/08 09:11:50

    NoJocks is at seat 0 with $.80.
    aussiefoxy is at seat 1 with $2.01.
    sealluv is at seat 2 with $.10.
    littleogre is at seat 3 with $3.51.
    Zwick08 is at seat 4 with $1.42.
    connemara is at seat 5 with $.62.
    suckatcarrS is at seat 6 with $.10.
    excedrinam is at seat 7 with $.10.
    Mindgazz is at seat 8 with $.22.
    GOciscoGO is at seat 9 with $.24.
    The button is at seat 3.

    Zwick08 posts the small blind of $.01.
    connemara posts the big blind of $.02.
    sealluv posts out of turn for $.02.

    NoJocks: -- --
    aussiefoxy: -- --
    sealluv: -- --
    littleogre: Ts Th
    Zwick08: -- --
    connemara: -- --
    suckatcarrS: -- --
    excedrinam: -- --
    Mindgazz: -- --
    GOciscoGO: -- --

    Pre-flop:

    suckatcarrS folds. excedrinam folds. Mindgazz
    folds. GOciscoGO folds. NoJocks folds. aussiefoxy
    calls. sealluv goes all-in for $.10. littleogre
    re-raises to $.25. Zwick08 folds. connemara goes
    all-in for $.62. aussiefoxy folds. littleogre
    folds. connemara is returned $.37 (uncalled).

    Flop (board: 5s Td 7s):

    (no action in this round)


    Turn (board: 5s Td 7s 8d):

    (no action in this round)


    River (board: 5s Td 7s 8d Qc):

    (no action in this round)




    Showdown:

    connemara shows 6h 6c.
    connemara has 6h 6c Td 8d Qc: a pair of sixes.
    sealluv shows Kd Jd.
    sealluv has Kd Jd Td 8d Qc: king high.


    Hand #49036566-40401 Summary:

    $.06 is raked from a total pot of $.63.
    $.03 is raked from the main pot of $.33.
    $.03 is raked from side pot #1 of $.30.
    connemara wins the main pot $.30 with a pair of sixes.
    connemara wins the side pot $.27 with a pair of sixes.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------

    i will post the converted seperatly
  2. #2
    Ultimate Bet No-Limit Hold'em, $.02 BB (10 handed) Ultimate-Bet Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: FlopTurnRiver)

    MP2 ($.80)
    MP3 ($2.01)
    CO ($.10)
    Hero ($3.51)
    SB ($1.42)
    BB ($.62)
    UTG ($.10)
    UTG+1 ($.10)
    UTG+2 ($.22)
    MP1 ($.24)

    Preflop: Hero is Button with T, T. CO posts a blind of $0.02.
    5 folds, MP3 calls $0.02, CO (poster) calls $0.02, Hero raises to $0.25, 2 folds, MP3 folds, Hero folds.

    Final Pot: $0.55
  3. #3
    anybody notice anything different about the 2 histories? As we can plainly see in the raw history connemara shoves all in after i raise. Now notice how in the converted HH it says everyone folded after i raised. So my question is what the heck is going on? It's like the cover rearanged the hand.
  4. #4
    ps this post my be more at home in the beginners section but i posted here seeing as how it is a nl history.
  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
    Why on earth did you fold?
  6. #6
    I thought it was a marginal decesion and was not sure of the correct one. See i kinda though any logical opponent would need a big hand to 3-bet all in. Anyway could you please explain why the converter is mucking my histories?
  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
    Sadly I can't - it'll be the coding of the converter, unless somehow you neglected to add any of the HH info. I'd just look for another converter that works tbh - neildewhurst.com or weaktight.com for example.
  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,548
    Location
    Putney, UK; Full Tilt,Mansion; $50 NL and PL; $13 and $16 SNGs at Stars
    Yes, he 3-bet, but he was so short that his range for doing so is much wider than if he had been full stacked. You beat any PPs up to 9, flip with any unpaired broadways, and only lose to JJ-KK. You are being asked to put 37c into a 97c pot so you only have to win about 30% of the time to make it +EV.
  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by biondino
    Yes, he 3-bet, but he was so short that his range for doing so is much wider than if he had been full stacked. You beat any PPs up to 9, flip with any unpaired broadways, and only lose to JJ-KK. You are being asked to put 37c into a 97c pot so you only have to win about 30% of the time to make it +EV.
    so a shorter stack means a wider 3 bet range. I will rember this the next time.
  10. #10
    lets try this.

    Ultimate Bet
    No Limit Holdem Ring game
    Blinds: $0.01./$0.02.
    10 players
    Converter

    Pre-flop: (10 players) Hero is Button with :ts :th
    5 folds, MP3 calls, CO raises all-in $0.1, Hero raises to $0.25, SB folds, BB raises all-in $0.62, MP3 folds, Hero folds.
    Uncalled bets: $0.37 returned to BB.

    Flop: :5s :td :7s ($0.46, 0 player + 2 all-in - Main pot: $0.33, Sidepot 1: $0.13)


    Turn: :8d ($0.46, 0 player + 2 all-in - Main pot: $0.33, Sidepot 1: $0.13)


    River: :qc ($0.46, 0 player + 2 all-in - Main pot: $0.33, Sidepot 1: $0.13)


    Results:
    Final pot: $0.46
  11. #11
    Xianti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Posts
    9,246
    Location
    facebook.com/mediacookery

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •