Quote Originally Posted by bigspenda73
wtf I want a trademark on my name!
Finders keepers.

Quote Originally Posted by Jason
If I had to wager a guess, I'd say quite simply you either don't get it or don't do it
LMAO... But yeah, I pretty much don't do it. Well, I do, it's just those few hands where I go retarded and lose it. But that's no limit baby (damn you Scotty Nguyen).

Quote Originally Posted by SaulPaul
Whats this obsession with small ball laggyness? Standard TAG poker is very effective at microstakes. Playing LAG is hard when you dont know if you're playing loose passive fish limping hands like 74s or a TAG who only limps pocket pairs
I'm not obsessed per say. I just find it easier to control the size of the pot more often than not. I know the standard is "tight is right" at the micros. So does this mean that the most profitable/least variance method of grinding the micros is to play +/- 12% of your hands? If that's generally the truth, I might as well open up 20 tables and sit on my hands.

Thanks for all the tips on BRM. I would rather be over-rolled for the stakes I'm at but then again replacing $200 isn't going to break me. I'm going to stick to $5NL for now though because for one, I haven't learned how to control tilt and two, I'm just not that good. I think I'm good but my online results let me know I'm very average.

Thanks