The reason I called on the flop here was that his bet was small and I wanted to see another card for that prize. With the read I know have on this guy I would have folded to his first bet.
You had him beat on the flop, why would you have folded? Don't fold because you think he has a pp, fold because you know he has you beat. Your read would've been completely wrong because you think he has 66. So you're saying fold because you think he bet on the flop, when reality he just threw a bet in to take it down there and make u think he has a J, or he thinks his 9's = best...which they weren't on the flop.

His 9's hit, his stack isn't big, so calling the $5 on the turn = me think jack or 9. More than likely beat. I don't see how you get low pp with a bet out on the flop. I'm thinking top pair or middle pair.

1. fold pre-flop duh

2. fold flop not because of set, but because wtf u gonna do with a 4 kicker? Hope he has a 3/2? I fold because I think I am outkicked, not because of set. He would've checked set (as he did turn/river). That 1.5 bet was a scare u out of pot bet and hope u didn't have jack. If I had JQ- AJ I would've re-raised for 5. If I get a call and that 9 hits, and he turns to check/call, I do the same.

3. Check, he wouldn't have called a $5 bet without a jack or a 9 on the turn, so why bet if you either have the same hand or you are beat? What were u expecting, to up the pot and split it so pp gets more rake?