|
|
 Originally Posted by Warpe
Originally Posted by Lukie
Originally Posted by Warpe
Originally Posted by a500lbgorilla
It's simple.
Poker is about the process not the result.
It doesnt matter how many times you're getting destacked, but how you're getting destacked.
The process is my point. If your process is optimal, over a very large sample statistically there should be zone where all your chips are in the middle x number of times for every y number of hands. Too few, or too many, and you're probably not playing optimally.
There should also be an optimal ratio of wins vs losses.
this just isn't true, because it is so highly dependant on how OTHER people are playing, or how your games are playing in general.
Variations in table conditions should level out with more hands played.
Between bdawg and myself (we both play NL400 6-max on stars), I'd agree to an extent. But it still depends so much on how YOU are playing. IE compare a LAG vs a TAG who have a very similar winrate. One is playing a ton of hands and is frequently stacking people and getting stacked. He has lots of variance. The nit however........ you get the point.
Between 2 unknown players playing in games with different stakes, on different sites, perhaps with different numbers of players, with different game and seat selection skills, who play at different times, etc etc etc, I'd very strongly disagree.
|
Reply With Quote