Quote Originally Posted by dontezuma
Stacks, I wasn't suggesting that you should throw QJ or 72 into that particular hand as bluffs interchangeably, because obv. QJ has 4 outs to a straight if you don't have a boat and 72 doesn't have that.

I was suggesting that when you are putting hands in your range for pokerstove calcs, you could throw a random air hand in to account for bluffs. If it's a value-betting nit, I ignore bluffing%, but for thinking players, donks, and maniacs, it's a very important piece of the equation, especially with any history at all with an opponent.

All in all, I agree with the thought of analyzing the equity in the value ranges, and calling the snap-offs profit, but in constructing your ranges, you have to include some air. Go to thinkingpoker.net sometime and read Andrew Brokos' stuff. There are some awesome articles on thinking about ranges, bluffing optimally, etc.
Yes you could, but this is inferior to the process of analysis that Stacks has briefly outlined.