Ok, I thought about posting this hand in the thread, but I think I'll wait. Give myself a litle more time to understand ABCD Theorem. I think it's only fair that I admit that I have not until tonight really began to understand it. And in the same breath I should say thanks for suggesting it again.

Now without putting it into the thread I would like to make sure I'm right on this point, When he bet the turn, I should have(as you said) called BECAUSE AQ then falls into the B range, call for pot control/deception. Call and re-evaluate. I can see now that my raise on the turn was basicaly pointless(I still had it in my A range, and that seems to be where 2nl gets a little bit tricky, when do you know when to move hands from your nut range?). And I should have DEFF. put A10 in his range...(DUHHHH) anyway. I invite more comments/replies.

I could probably talk about this for an hour right now because it's really unvailing itself to me.