Hand 1:
The interesting bit here was chosing to flat call preflop rather than 4bet preflop. This was somewhat prompted by the rail and especially supported by Spenda based on the reasoning that playing KK here protects the weaker parts of your 3b calling range. He then went back on that (thinking less of his opponent I think) and said it's basically worth doing to extract value from the hand sometimes when you're in position.

Hand 2:
There question here was again regarding pre-flop aggression. Should we 3bet this hand? XTR chose the nitty path here because he's been spewing lately, which is fair. I just think if we call here OOP we're suddenly not playing for much more than set value. Which I guess is also fair. I'm the kind of guy who'd be tempted to stab at the flop, because I expect the button opening range to be wide enough to contain more than just aces, but I spew. On the turn raise I agree with the fold also. If memory serves the raise was pretty quick aka an easy decision (Edit: on video review it wasn't that quick - more like 5 secs). So either he has a monster, was greatly improved by the turn, or something that in a certain light looks like a monster (and in some cases slowplayed the flop). So AA, 88, 66, 33 are all in his range, as is AcXc. Not really much he'd raise with that we can reliably say we are ahead of except maybe 9c7c or 7c5c - this should be an easy fold.

Hand 3: I requested this one - it's one of those 'why did I play this hand in the first place' things. Not to say that playing the hand in the first place is questionable, but I'm just thinking that the flop isn't good for us, but the turn gives us a gutshot with two overs and I was wondering if it was worth continuing in the hand. Or to return to my introduction, if we don't continue in a hand when we get a piece of the flop then it is probably questionable to play in the first place. Spenda correctly pointed out that our outs are sometimes dirty - like a T could make anyone with an 8 a straight - but tbh I think the villain range at this time is wide enough that hands that contaminate our outs are a pretty small part of villain's range. I wouldn't count either T or K 100% as a clean out, but I wouldn't call it dirty half the time either. They'd be questionable outs. I don't remember who the opponent was here, but with the passiveness in the hand Hero looks like he might be ready to give up on it. Wide BTN raising range, missed flop (no cbet) - let me just donk and steal this on the turn with ATC. I don't think I would be unhappy with Hero raising the turn. If re-raised villain has a better draw or a two-pair/set hand and we fold thinking little of it. If called we're OOP on missed rivers, hmm. If we hit the straight it's a value bet, if we hit the overcard it's probably check-calling a bet. If we miss.. I don't know. Is he more likely to call a raise with a made set or a drawing hand? Maybe we could size the bet to keep drawing hands in, so we can bluff at a river that misses all draws (no clubs, no 5, no 8, no T). I'm certainly not good enough to play at these stakes, and I don't disagree with the low variance fold here, but I'm tempted by the turn raise.

Hand 4:
This flop hits the UTG range pretty well and for SB to donk into it he almost has to want a call, so it's a fold for me too. He may have something like high card diamonds, maybe with the Kd for the top pair. Good fold imo.

Hand 5:
Flatting 3b IP in what..isn't actually a blind steal. It says Hero is on BTN, but he's actually on CO with villain on BTN. This hand occurred while I was off the conference call to fix my recording issues that made me sound like nothing but noise so only heard the end of the discussion. Again we're here talking about 3b or 4b. I think the conclusion was the you could 4b/fold here if you think the villain will only shove AA,KK. I think Spenda said something about QQ being 33% vs AA, KK, AK, where on my pokerstove it's 39.9%, so maybe I just misheard something XTR said that the last 4 or so times he 4b QQ in this situation he got shoved on with AA or KK (he called), so if that's the normal shoving range at this site/limit it's certainly not profitable to 4b/call. On the flop, we're OOP in a 3b pot with a K-high flop and holding QQ. BTN may have widened his 3b range because he expects CO to have a wide range also, but there will still be a good number of kings in his hand range, so a fold is probably fine.

Hand 6:
Previously we had been discussing raise sizes from the button with spenda saying that anyone who raises more than 3x from the button he'd basically consider a bad player on par with someone who is not positionally aware and then this hand came along. Based on the preflop bet I bravely called the villain's hand TT (I was wrong). My point was, this villain seems a certain kind of bad player to me. One who knows and has been told that TT is a good hand, but every time he plays it he ends up losing to a higher pair - so he'd almost rather play his good hand in a way that gets folds so he at least doesn't lose on them. A special kind of poor player applies this "logic" to TT and raises it bigger preflop to discourage callers(?), sometimes JJ and also sometimes AK. TT is just the archetypical hand for it. Again the shove on the flop is in my experience (at lower stakes) more often a made but vulnerable hand who is happy to see the fold. It makes no sense at all to bloat the pot on a hand you yourself think of as vulnerable but a lot of people do it. AA is in good shape here most of the time. If not all the time - he'd probably slowplay a set (KK only set making hand in his range) and call with it.

Hand 7:
Ok, we call the 99 from the SB mainly for set value against a too big preflop bet(?). On the flop we pick up a gutshot and peel one off to a big cbet(?). The turn gives us a set and puts 4 to a straight on the board - time for pot control for both parties. The river here is interesting and caused a bit of discussion. I didn't say anything when XTR was betting but I was thinking - something small like $12 and he bet $10. Then Spenda said he'd have bet smaller. I can follow Spenda here, an $8 bet might be called by even more hands that we beat and we can still fold to raises. Basics of betting - are you called by hands that you beat? Do you cause hands stronger than yours to fold? In this case we're not getting folds by better, the question is how to maximise against that we beat.