Giving Hookers Orgasms

Originally Posted by manfredi

When you give a hooker an orgasm, you're paying her to get the best of you. Why would you want to take a perfectly profitable situation and fuck it up so badly that she gets the money and the orgasm? Do you like to get screwed?

Spoon is saying that he prefers to be the hooker who gets the money and the orgasm. When he finds a John, he takes care to arrange the situation to his sole benefit.

There is a related thread around here somewhere, titled 69 in Position - Neutral EV?, in which a chopped pot analogy is drawn from a sexual arrangement requiring that both parties put chips in the pot (if you know what I mean) and neither has an orgasm.

well that's well put and all, but i still don't get the word play

Cool thread, missed this the first time around.

Originally Posted by surviva316

well that's well put and all, but i still don't get the word play

IMO, the point spoon is trying to make is that even though you know its completely illogical to want to give a hooker an orgasm you're still tempted to try. In the same vein, even though you know its completely illogical to shove AK into a range of QQ+, you're still tempted to do it.

aka lose the pride and use your judgment

Originally Posted by kfaess

Cool thread, missed this the first time around.




IMO, the point spoon is trying to make is that even though you know its completely illogical to want to give a hooker an orgasm you're still tempted to try. In the same vein, even though you know its completely illogical to shove AK into a range of QQ+, you're still tempted to do it.

aka lose the pride and use your judgment

yep, he nailed it.









c wat i did there?