Bollocks did I. I said maybe I'm better at manipulating pot sizes in my favour when my range is wide than when my range is tight. There's a world of difference.you say maybe we just aren't as good as you with manipulating pot sizes
Again, you're completely misunderstood what I've said. I said that when I beat AK with something shit like 23, the pots I take down are more than twice as big as the pots I fold when I miss the flop with my shit hand. If the pots are indeed more than twice as big, then two low cards against AK is profitable for me.to believe that pots are twice as big when you win with T6s vs pots that you win with KTs is ridiculous.
Yeah, I know. I'm playing them too, or at least most of them.what matters is that there are WAAAAAAAAAAAY more hands that you can play profitably by iso'ing two limpers from the cutoff.
Haha this actually made me laugh. You're probably right in that I'm not getting enough value, this is where I'm looking to improve. But the rest is just a crap collection of words, a piss poor attempt to insult me. I reckon you're ginger with ginger pubes.but i'd argue that you're prolly just not doing a good enough job getting 3 streets of value with mediocre hands, and have to rely on miracle flushes and straights to make you feel like a god at poker.
