Okay here we go. I'm going to run down a handful of points that will probably be useful to you:

  • In full-ring, the numbers are scaled down a little bit in terms of some of the pre-flop stats. A typical tight/aggressive player who is 21/17 in 6-max who opened the same things from the same positions (based on # of seats from the button) would run something like 15/12 in full-ring. As a general rule, multiply the full-ring VPIP/PFR by 1.5 to get their equivalent in six-max. (I tended to prefer full-ring myself.)
  • When there is a large gap between the VPIP and PFR, that generally indicates a loose/passive player. There are some exceptions to this if the player is very aggressive post-flop, but 99 times out of 100, it would indicate a loose/passive. For example, your 19/13 here would be about 29/20 or so in six-max.
  • Comparing the PFR and steal percentage (ATS) helps you to determine how positionally aware the player is. By positionally aware, I mean that the larger the ATS is compared to the PFR, the more hands the player is going to play from late position compared to early position. Note that the ATS stat is determined by the percentage of time the player open raises from the CO, BU and SB seats, so this would actually translate directly from six-max to full-ring (a 30% ATS in one means a 30% ATS in the other for the most part).
  • For his 3-betting range, you have to look at the positions and situations that he's 3-betting from. He's not going to just 3-bet the same hands in all situations. The range of {QQ+, AK} is about 2.6 percent, so he's probably calling pre-flop with AK/QQ in some situations and 3-bet bluffing here and there in some situations based on the showdown hands you described and his 3-bet stat.
  • Note that he does not fold to 3-bets very often. This is a key characteristic of the loose/passive. It's interesting how you can largely determine how he'll react to 3-bets by his VPIP/PFR in this situation.